Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-11-2016, 07:13 AM
 
8,131 posts, read 4,324,505 times
Reputation: 4683

Advertisements

I wouldn't call it a landslide, Trump didn't win the popular VOTE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2016, 03:38 PM
 
8,498 posts, read 4,552,009 times
Reputation: 9734
Here are some FACTS on Trump's imaginary landslide victory:

  • In terms of his Electoral College margin, which will probably end up at 306 to 232, Trump will rank #46 among the 58 presidential elections that have been held, or just above the bottom 20%.
  • In terms of his popular vote margin, Trump will probably end up with the third-worst popular vote result ever, or if you prefer 56th ranked of the 58 winning candidates in history. (Obviously the 58 elections have produced 45 presidents, some of them winning two terms and FDR winning four.) This ranking is based on Trump’s losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by a little more than 2 percent, or a little less than 3 million votes. John Quincy Adams lost the popular vote by 10 percent in 1824 to Andrew Jackson, and also came in second in the electoral vote—but became president when the race went to the House, since none of the four candidates had an Electoral College majority. He is #58 out of 58, in terms of popular-vote mandate for winners. Rutherford B. Hayes, who won the electoral college while losing the popular vote by 3 percent to Samuel Tilden in 1876, is #57. Donald Trump, losing by 2 percent, is #56. Every president except J.Q. Adams and Hayes came to office with a stronger popular-vote mandate than Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 03:55 PM
 
Location: University City, Philadelphia
22,632 posts, read 14,934,738 times
Reputation: 15935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott_Holiday View Post
With 46 percent of the vote and 2 million less votes than Clinton. Clinton's 500 counties account for 65 percent of United States economic activity. The other 2,600 counties account for 35 percent of us economic activity. Trump won a whole lot of sparsely populated counties and only won the electoral college by 97,000 combined in 3 states. How is that a landslide? Probably 10 percent of those 46 percenters voted for trump because they disliked Clinton more
Exactly right.

Hillary won the popular vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 03:59 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,115,129 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiotAct41 View Post
"worthless red states"... sums up most liberals' mindsets pretty well!!! Maybe a clue as to why they lost big.
How did they lose big when over 46% of eligible voters did not even bother coming out to vote and Hillary won the popular vote?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,521,957 times
Reputation: 24780
Talking Trump won 83% of the Counties

But lost the vote by two and a half million.

Trumplings are SO sensitive about it, too.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 06:09 PM
 
27,213 posts, read 46,724,071 times
Reputation: 15662
Trump supporters are proud of their candidate as he was so smart to see what was IMPORTANT to win which was the electoral vote.

Hillary proved that after decades of being a politician she had no clue that she needed to win the electoral vote.

Her campaign with all the fake news, lies and deceiving, only had a chance in their own minds and never thought the outcome would happen as it did.

This loss may hunt them for year or even decades as they lost the Supreme court and the trust of even their own voters and the Democratic party was exposed for what they really are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 09:29 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,295,278 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
But lost the vote by two and a half million.
And reached and exceeded the 270 electoral votes to win the election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,364,856 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
Are you getting paid by the word? Or are you just a dyed in the wool propagandist?

Either way, I think you are approaching Trump overkill. Everyone knows he won. Your gloating isn't going to change that, and it won't change anyone who voted for Clinton's minds, for sure. Why not give it a rest until the guy has a chance to prove he's really worthy of your adoration?
Everyone knows he won? You wouldn't know that based on the threads started by Democrat sycophants every day about challenging the electoral votes, investigating the email controversy and on and on. Why would you expect Trump supporters to quit when Hillary die hards refuse to accept she lost?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 09:38 PM
 
32,059 posts, read 15,040,845 times
Reputation: 13663
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
Trump supporters are proud of their candidate as he was so smart to see what was IMPORTANT to win which was the electoral vote.

Hillary proved that after decades of being a politician she had no clue that she needed to win the electoral vote.

Her campaign with all the fake news, lies and deceiving, only had a chance in their own minds and never thought the outcome would happen as it did.

This loss may hunt them for year or even decades as they lost the Supreme court and the trust of even their own voters and the Democratic party was exposed for what they really are.
So you are admitting that the fakes news, lies and deceits by others caused Hillary to lose. Yep, just what I thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2016, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,364,856 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
That's not how a landslide works. No one cares about worthless red states.
And those "worthless red states" make up 46% of the population and gave a big **** to your smug, self centered, elitist blue states.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...s-of-2016.html

But keep up the elitism, you'll guarantee Trump wins again in 2020 and another GOP candidate wins in 2024.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top