Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Don't worry, none of the Democratic candidates are actually socialists. Universal healthcare, affordable college educations, and a living wage are extensions of government programs we already have. Even if all of these things came to pass we would still be a mixed economy where capitalism is the largest player.
False. Bernie is a self-described socialist. Based on his past associations it appears that he has been a true believer socialist. Pending clarification/denial from him we can assume that he remains so.
The 53-41 advantage of Bernie over Trump is a pipe dream. If Bernie is the nominee, I predict a result similar to McGovern in 1972. He lost 49 states to an unpopular GOP candidate. I'll give Bernie 5 states since Trump is even a worse candidate than Nixon.
Socialism isn't a yes or no label, it's a matter of degree. Ole Bern is the most socialistic candidate the dems have and that's just a fact.
Politicians should be defined by their personal beliefs and their legislative successes . Bern has only his rhetoric to define him since he has no legislative wins. So in conclusion, he's a socialist wind bag.
Socialism isn't a yes or no label, it's a matter of degree. Ole Bern is the most socialistic candidate the dems have and that's just a fact.
Politicians should be defined by their personal beliefs and their legislative successes . Bern has only his rhetoric to define him since he has no legislative wins. So in conclusion, he's a socialist wind bag.
Why is it that seeing that people can access a doctor affordably more socialist than bailing out a business?
Why is it that propping up the poor more socialist than propping up investments?
Why is it that seeing that people can access a doctor affordably more socialist than bailing out a business?
Why is it that propping up the poor more socialist than propping up investments?
You're trying to define my statement though your biased examples. That's what's called a "loaded" question. If you want to control the answers you seek, ask ignorant questions. Good job. Based on your questions... the assumption is: the only thing poor people need in order to succeed, is more government support = mo money, more of my money. That's BS.
Better
How can we make seeing a doctor more affordable?
Better
How can we help those willing to work earn more? without propping up anyone or anything?
You guys will never learn and you will NEVER understand the Trump base......
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
