Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Democrats are committed to ending discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, age, sexual orientation or disability status. You know protecting Americans’ Civil Rights.
I know that you write some strange things on here, so who knows whether or not you're serious, but if you are....this one's a howler.
Democrats are committed to ending discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, age, sexual orientation or disability status. You know protecting Americans’ Civil Rights. If it makes you feel better to call those who support our Constitutional experiment of moving toward a more perfect union ignorant leftist pukes, of course you have every right to do so.
Be it known, though, that your label says far more about you then it does about those to whom you falsely feel superior, dear.
Peace.
Maybe many Democratic voters are committed. But not most of their politicians and leaders. It is the exact opposite.
Democrat leaders are committed to deliberately taking advantage of, increasing, prolonging and exasperating racial, ethnic, gender and religious tensions because that is the major way their party get votes. They been doing it since at least the American Civil War.
Democrat leaders are committed to deliberately taking advantage of, increasing, prolonging and exasperating racial, ethnic, gender and religious tensions because that is the major way their party get votes. They been doing it since at least the American Civil War.
They are just 'outside agitators' like the segregationists complained about, claiming that the locals did not mind the way they were treated? If you think that is past history, remember that Texas tried to bar out of state residents from being voting canvassers ten years ago! The state wanted no outside agitators stirring folks up.
They are just 'outside agitators' like the segregationists complained about, claiming that the locals did not mind the way they were treated? If you think that is past history, remember that Texas tried to bar out of state residents from being voting canvassers ten years ago! The state wanted no outside agitators stirring folks up.
Democrats are the segregationists. They've been at it since the Civil War.
Democrats are the segregationists. They've been at it since the Civil War.
From history:This act, signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson on July 2, 1964, prohibited discrimination in public places, provided for the integration of schools and other public facilities, and made employment discrimination illegal. It was the most sweeping civil rights legislation since Reconstruction.Feb 8, 2022
A pew study found:Republicans are far more likely than Democrats to say increased attention to history of slavery and racism is bad for the country.
Which begs to ask, if being transparent in the history or the attention to learn from our past is ' not good' then why is the republican NOW on this finger pointing mission ?
Is not the republican party currently gathering into it's fold the oath keepers, kkk, and all.the proud Boyz? Notorious for ignorant white supremacy. ? The QaNutzo folks?
Yeah that's what I thought.
But keep saying they are not racist.
The rest of this nation knows which party wants war and internal divide .
From history:This act, signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson on July 2, 1964, prohibited discrimination in public places, provided for the integration of schools and other public facilities, and made employment discrimination illegal. It was the most sweeping civil rights legislation since Reconstruction.Feb 8, 2022
A pew study found:Republicans are far more likely than Democrats to say increased attention to history of slavery and racism is bad for the country.
Which begs to ask, if being transparent in the history or the attention to learn from our past is ' not good' then why is the republican NOW on this finger pointing mission ?
Is not the republican party currently gathering into it's fold the oath keepers, kkk, and all.the proud Boyz? Notorious for ignorant white supremacy. ? The QaNutzo folks?
Yeah that's what I thought.
But keep saying they are not racist.
The rest of this nation knows which party wants war and internal divide .
Nonsense. The Republican Party has nothing to do with any of them. Name 1 Republican law that is racist or white supremacist. Name 1? You can't but I can name Democrat laws and politics that are racists and discriminates against 1 race of people and they don't apologize.
on the 1964 Civil Rights act, a President can't pass a bill by himself. House: m Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%) Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%).
Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
Without the GOP the bill doesn't pass and let's not forget that LBJ blocked a lot of civil rights bill in the 50's under GOP Eisenhower. That's history. That was 1964 and We are in 2022.
Nonsense. The Republican Party has nothing to do with any of them. Name 1 Republican law that is racist or white supremacist.
Stephen Miller in the Trump White House; former IA Republican congressman King, those 'good folks' (in the words of the Republicans) who chanted at Charlottesville that they would not be replaced. Republican laws to suppress minority votes are nothing but racist; the New Jim Crow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar
You can't but I can name Democrat laws and politics that are racists and discriminates against 1 race of people and they don't apologize.
Reverse discrimination should only be criticized by those who objected to obverse discrimination.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar
on the 1964 Civil Rights act ...
Republican historical misuse of statistics. It was a progressive joint. Where are the GOP progressives now?
You don't mention Strom Thurmond or Jesse Helms, recent Republican stalwarts and lifelong opponents of civil rights for black folks.
From history:This act, signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson on July 2, 1964, prohibited discrimination in public places, provided for the integration of schools and other public facilities, and made employment discrimination illegal. It was the most sweeping civil rights legislation since Reconstruction.Feb 8, 2022
.
The overwhelming GOP % voting for it overcame the smaller % of Dems voting for it.
Nonsense. The Republican Party has nothing to do with any of them. Name 1 Republican law that is racist or white supremacist. Name 1? You can't but I can name Democrat laws and politics that are racists and discriminates against 1 race of people and they don't apologize.
on the 1964 Civil Rights act, a President can't pass a bill by himself. House: m Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%) Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%).
Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
Without the GOP the bill doesn't pass and let's not forget that LBJ blocked a lot of civil rights bill in the 50's under GOP Eisenhower. That's history. That was 1964 and We are in 2022.
Btw, Biden's bussing stance as a Senator was 100% racist. Biden did also become the lead Democrat to steer Three Strike and you're out through. No other Democrat even attended Strom Thurmond's funeral. Biden did the eulogy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
