Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-15-2008, 02:51 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,192,463 times
Reputation: 4027

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by skootr View Post
You and your Communist ilk will be exposed soon enough.
If you said that to my face you would be on the ground so fast you wouldn't realize what hit you....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-15-2008, 02:58 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,192,463 times
Reputation: 4027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
In keeping with this discussion, I'd like to see your penis, too
I doubt he has one, even if he does you can be sure he has no gonads to go with it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2008, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,729,686 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by skootr View Post
I don't understand how hard it is for this man to produce a document.
A reasonable attempt has not been made to quell this legitimate concern.
Many people think I'm crazy or just a "sore loser", but they're wrong.
A "sore loser" would complain with no justification. I HAVE justification.
Perhaps Mr. Obama just has something to hide? Why all the secrecy, hmm?
A man like McCain would be reasonable enough to provide the documents.
Reall, it seems like this is "below" the Messiah, for some reason.
Only the second coming could get away with such behavior.
Don't think for a second we as a people will let him get away with this.
Yes, we can: we can stop an illegitimate presidency!!!
Oh, come on! No reasonable attempts have been made to quell the concern. When I say the Gov. of Hawaii verified his bc, which has been posted on the web, you say she's crooked. Gimme a freakin' break!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2008, 03:03 PM
 
68 posts, read 81,536 times
Reputation: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
If you said that to my face you would be on the ground so fast you wouldn't realize what hit you....
I don't think that's going to happen any time soon.
Surely you don't propose we meet in real life, do you? That'd be weird!
Understand, I don't like Communists, so I hope you are not one.
Communists are ruining this country, and some people don't get it.
Know that YOU might not be one, but they are out there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2008, 03:25 PM
 
1,830 posts, read 5,349,571 times
Reputation: 1991
And yet you want to turn this country into Nazi Germany where one must show his papers every time you demand it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2008, 03:59 PM
 
Location: West, Southwest, East & Northeast
3,463 posts, read 7,305,283 times
Reputation: 871
Cort Wrotnowksi's case, Wrotnowksi v. Connecticut Secretary of State, has been denied by the U. S. Supreme Court.

Docket #08A469 -- The application for stay and/or injunction addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied.

Update: Judicial review is allowed only after the Electoral College vote and Congressional Certification.

Mechanisms exist under the Twelfth Amendment and 3 U.S.C. 15 for any challenge to any candidate to be ventilated when electoral votes are counted, and the Twentieth Amendment provides guidance regarding how to proceed if a president elect shall have failed to qualify.

Issues regarding qualifications or lack thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in Congress.

Therefore, this order holds that the challenge presented by plaintiff is committed under the Constitution to the electors and the legislative branch, at least in the first instance. Judicial review, if any, should occur only after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course.


The Justices denied the "stay", but have retained the "certori." The case is not dead. They’re waiting for the Electoral College to actually elect him. Obama is not President Elect until after the Electoral College "elects" him. Then Congress must approve the Election. Only one senator AND only one representative are needed to stop Obama’s election approval.

Last edited by Kootr; 12-15-2008 at 04:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2008, 04:12 PM
 
Location: Hangin' with the bears.
3,813 posts, read 4,914,505 times
Reputation: 915
Dream on, Koot, dream on.

Obama is your worst nightmare and my silver lining!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2008, 04:15 PM
 
Location: The Planet Mars
2,159 posts, read 2,582,906 times
Reputation: 523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kootr View Post
Cort Wrotnowksi's case, Wrotnowksi v. Connecticut Secretary of State, has been denied by the U. S. Supreme Court.

Docket #08A469 -- The application for stay and/or injunction addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied.

Update: Judicial review is allowed only after the Electoral College vote and Congressional Certification.

Mechanisms exist under the Twelfth Amendment and 3 U.S.C. 15 for any challenge to any candidate to be ventilated when electoral votes are counted, and the Twentieth Amendment provides guidance regarding how to proceed if a president elect shall have failed to qualify.

Issues regarding qualifications or lack thereof can be laid before the voting public before the election and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in Congress.

Therefore, this order holds that the challenge presented by plaintiff is committed under the Constitution to the electors and the legislative branch, at least in the first instance. Judicial review, if any, should occur only after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course.


The Justices denied the "stay", but have retained the "certori." The case is not dead. They’re waiting for the Electoral College to actually elect him. Obama is not President Elect until after the Electoral College "elects" him. Then Congress must approve the Election. Only one senator AND only one representative are needed to stop Obama’s election approval.
Anyone who quotes articles from the National Enquirer has absolutely NO CREDIBILITY AT ALL when posting opinions about legal matters....

That's like taking medical advice from the 3-Stooges!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2008, 04:17 PM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,192,463 times
Reputation: 4027
Kootr if you can C & P a post from Hannity forums without giving credit I guess I can too ... this from the guy who posted what you pasted here:

"Guys! This is NOT a directive from SCOTUS! It's a quote from "U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup ruled that John McCain should be on the California ballot. Robinson v Bowen, C08-3836, n.d." ...so let's not go off half-cocked (like I did when I posted it!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2008, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Hiawatha neighborhood of Minneapolis
241 posts, read 435,498 times
Reputation: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kootr View Post
The Justices denied the "stay", but have retained the "certori." The case is not dead. They’re waiting for the Electoral College to actually elect him. Obama is not President Elect until after the Electoral College "elects" him. Then Congress must approve the Election. Only one senator AND only one representative are needed to stop Obama’s election approval.
Please get your hopes up on this one- what the heck: hold your breath!

And then, when your hopes are crushed by...reality...please describe your feelings of dejection to us in detail.

I want to enjoy this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top