Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-06-2014, 08:27 PM
 
26,777 posts, read 22,529,485 times
Reputation: 10037

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Postman View Post
I actually like that particular building.
What's so special about this building? How this box is different from other boxes?

Quote:
I like the Shard too. I think it's a matter of personal tastes. To me London already has enough fancy ornate Georgian architecture (as great as it is). A bit of modern steel and glass gives the city variety, depth.
Of course the old cities can have an addition of "modern steel and glass."
They just shouldn't be the monstrosities that clearly destroy the original architectural idea of European cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2014, 08:32 PM
 
Location: M I N N E S O T A
14,773 posts, read 21,490,401 times
Reputation: 9263
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Postman View Post
Yes, I like the newer designs. Skylines like Dallas':

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.n...51385557_n.jpg

are typically very American in being very angular, blocky, minimalist with clean surfaces, not much augmentation.
I really like Des Moines Iowa for some reason
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 09:20 PM
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
9,556 posts, read 20,790,599 times
Reputation: 2833
Quote:
Originally Posted by erasure View Post
What's so special about this building? How this box is different from other boxes?



Of course the old cities can have an addition of "modern steel and glass."
They just shouldn't be the monstrosities that clearly destroy the original architectural idea of European cities.
I don't know, it looks like a machine. I don't think it's a 'monstrosity.' If you want monstrosity try this out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antilia_(building)

The story behind it is probably the most monstrous part of it.

Last edited by The Postman; 01-06-2014 at 10:20 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
9,556 posts, read 20,790,599 times
Reputation: 2833
Quote:
Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3 View Post
I really like Des Moines Iowa for some reason
Yes, not bad. Chicago, Seattle, Pittsburgh and actually LA have the nicest skylines imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 10:13 PM
 
26,777 posts, read 22,529,485 times
Reputation: 10037
Quote:
Originally Posted by iNviNciBL3 View Post
I really like Des Moines Iowa for some reason



Seattle all the way.

http://www.netip.org/blog/wp-content...4/seattle2.jpg

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 10:16 PM
 
26,777 posts, read 22,529,485 times
Reputation: 10037
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Postman View Post
I don't know, it looks like a machine.
Who needs a "machine" there???

Quote:
I don't think it's a 'monstrosity.' If you want monstrosity try this out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antilia_(building)

The story behind it is probably the most monstrous part of it.
That's... their problem. That ugly thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2014, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
9,556 posts, read 20,790,599 times
Reputation: 2833
Well I like it.

Sorry comma was in the wrong place:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antilia_(building)

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2014, 12:34 AM
 
Location: Leeds, UK
22,112 posts, read 29,574,917 times
Reputation: 8819
The new 'Walkie Talkie' skyscraper in London is absolutely hideous IMO, and it melts cars. It looks alright from the front tough.


London Skyline Dawn by Cyclopic Fun, on Flickr

Here's London's skyline back in 2005:


The London Skyline... of DOOM by Trenchfoot, on Flickr
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2014, 04:45 AM
 
2,339 posts, read 2,930,081 times
Reputation: 2349
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunno what to put here View Post
The new 'Walkie Talkie' skyscraper in London is absolutely hideous IMO, and it melts cars. It looks alright from the front tough.
To be honest, this is nothing compared to the New York skyline, both in number and height of tall buildings. I think it is even preferable to have no skyscapers at all like Paris or Amsterdam than to have only one which only barely keeps up with the ones in New York and Chicago. The Shard just looks unnatural like this. It is the same with houses, cars, boats, rv's, roads, everything is more and bigger in the US so please let's stop pretending we can keep up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2014, 08:32 AM
 
1,327 posts, read 2,605,095 times
Reputation: 1565
There are skyscrapers in Paris.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Europe

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top