Quote:
Originally Posted by HoodsofATL
Okay I've been thinking on this for about a few months now and it really pertains to the South and the Southeast in particular in the US. Okay so while the slave trade was going on Native Americans were going through their own sorrows, struggles and persecution by the same oppressor as the Africans in the slave trade. When the Africans came over its documented they were befriended with the Natives and some of the Natives even owned the slaves and treated with better treatment overall, plus they would compliment and help each other and their relationship was steady for quite awhile before the Trail of Tears and the near eradication of the Native population.
So here's the theory: I believe everything happens for a reason. The Native Americans and the Africans as a collective, in the spiritual sense decided to come together and create another race (bare with me ) which was African Americans [of course other races play apart in it, but the two main ones were the people from the natives of the Africa and the natives of the North America]
These two groups both share similar histories of oppression with the same group and both are nearly gone from this country (not African immigrants but the Africans who came with the Atlantic Slave Trade i.e. The Gullah People in the Lowcountry)
I say the southeast in particular because that's where Natives and Africans would seemingly flourish as far as interaction goes. For example the Black Seminoles in Florida is pretty common so I assume that the Southeast would be a hotbed area and also in Georgia I notice African Americans with a red tint, me included. I know that my great grandmother on my dad side was pure blood Native but I don't know what tribe and my great grandmother's mother on my mama side was pure blood. So I know I'm an example of this theory.
Any Thoughts?
|
I honestly don't know why Black people care so much for "good" slavery??
you hear this bullsh*t all the time (oh but they treated their slaves better than etc..)
WTF????
this says, just one example "there wasw little difference in slavery between Cherokee and European-American society. They made tribal laws that shoed favor for Cherokees and Whites but disfavored Blacks."
http://en.wikipedi.org/wiki/Cherokee_freedmen
maybe that small percent of Native American DNA found in a small handful of African Americans is because native Americans raped their African slaves too.
why the hell is there such a thing as "lenient slavery"??? that is just stupid
ad if your judgement on that is based the amount of pseudo-freedom granted to them by the owner then obviously white people were "good" l slave owners too. All you have to do is look at the case of Robert Smalls.
but that not true across the board and there's no reason to think it's any different for a native American slave owner.
I mean they were just property, right? they were still property, right? they didn't care so much about them as to actually free them or anything, did they?
I mean until they were forced to free them just like with white people.
so you feel beter about it knowing they were still slaves but weren't raped and beaten AS much as the next owner?
that's just stupid and its equalltyu stupid to think white slave owners in general were these mean violent owners al the time
MOST white slave owners were POOR people or small famers who could not actually afford to torure their slaves and they were usually ourtside working the fields with them
only the 5% or less who actuall own Plantations could be so careless as to rape and torture their slaves dispairngly
ALSO seriously what the hell makes ANYONE think native Ameeicans didn't torture their African slaves either?
except for the Seminole most Native Americans had nothing to do with African Americans and they even kidnapped them along with their white masters on the frontier sometimes
maybe then they had close contact I ffhry adopated them or tey could have just killed them as well.
They didn thave any close relationship and if they did it was more likely at a time when white intnetured servants also ahd a closer relationship with African slaves too earlier in the 1600s.
I guess the OP ahs never heard of the Cherokee Freedmen controversy?
its stupid to think Native Americans cared so much for African slaves anymore than anyone else did.
plus its also stupid to think all wite slave owners were inhumane.
this links ays otherwise in some cases
Stonewall Jackson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and here is what some Modern Native Americans think about black tribal members
Cherokee freedmen controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and despite what the OP claims, anyone that knows anything at all about DNA studies and Southern history knows the overwhelming majority of both African Americans and White Americans even from the South don't have one drop of Naïve American blood or genes and out of the few who do its usually less than 5% or around that
so there couldn't have been hardly any mixing going on.
African Americans have a much higher percent of western European ancestry than they do any Native American ancestry.
and as for what I said about slavery? probably all slave owners were cruel and violent
they probavbly all had experiences like with what you hear in the Slave Narratives
I honeslty don't know why a Native American slave owner would javge been different especially since they owned slaves for the exact same reason white owners did
for economic exploitation and nothing else
and if they were better to their slaves then they probably treated them about the same as most white owners who were really just small farmers and not large planters.
what is it with black people or anyone else giving excuses to people who were "good" slave owners??
talk about a bunch of Uncle Toms.
and from what I've been told most true Native Americans on reservations laugh when they hear about all of the native American ancestry in White and African Americans
if all of that mixing went on then how come they weren't wiped out or largely absorbed from that alone?
it happened sometimes but was more rarer than people think.
people are clueless when it coms to genetics and history.
yes even in the South it was the same as everywhere else with very very very few exceptions.
to the OP: if your great grandmother was a pure-blooded native American then their should be paper work and census records showing that and what tribe she was from.
that doesn't seem like some remote distant ancestor. If its just your great grandmother it means no earlier than the 1800's which is when they took records for tribes and native Americans more extensively since it was about the time of Indian removal.
those records should be there especially if she came from the South.
and the fact she was a pure blood in the 1800's means her ancestors must have lived largely within a tribe up to that point for her to not have any White ancestry in that late of a date/era.