Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-17-2017, 05:58 AM
 
Location: New York Area
35,019 posts, read 16,978,303 times
Reputation: 30143

Advertisements

She let her campaign degenerate into infighting. If she can't run a campaign how can she be President? There was also nothing innovative about her other than that she was female.

Give the devil his due, Trump, at 70, ran the first Internet campaign ever. And I mean Internet at the core, not just trappings like websites. And even though not a political professional he understood that running up votes in California and New York served no purpose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2017, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Billings, MT
9,885 posts, read 10,969,651 times
Reputation: 14180
Is the Electoral System flawed? I don't know, I guess it depends from which side you view it.
How do we change it? Simple, read Article V of the United States Constitution, and follow the instructions contained therein.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 04:58 PM
 
10,501 posts, read 7,031,187 times
Reputation: 32344
People always want to throw the Electoral College out when they get a vote they don't like.

In truth, the wisdom of the Electoral College is apparent to me. It keeps candidates from simply flogging the population centers and instead forces them to campaign out in what some people call Flyover Land. It also keeps politicians from ignoring the needs of those in those states.

Hillary Clinton is the pluperfect example of that. In her March 13, 2016 town hall appearance, Hillary Clinton said the following:

So for example, I'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right?

And we're going to make it clear that we don't want to forget those people. Those people labored in those mines for generations, losing their health, often losing their lives to turn on our lights and power our factories.

Now we've got to move away from coal and all the other fossil fuels, but I don't want to move away from the people who did the best they could to produce the energy that we relied on.


Well, it was a noble sentiment except for a salient point -- by eliminating coal mines and coal companies by dint of executive order, the governing class had already forgotten about them. Even so, she didn't really speak to their problems in any substantive way. Theory is one thing. But when you're a 50-year-old high-school graduate who performed well-paying, dignified work in the coal mines, just the way your dad and grandad did, this speech basically told you, "We're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business."

Just an incredibly ham-handed statement. Because what 50- or 55-year-old guy with a high school diploma is going to be able to start over? At best, he can maybe hope for an assistant manager position at an Auto Zone or a Denny's somewhere. Even then he'll have to move because the only industry in town was just shut down by executive fiat. Even so, Clinton completely failed to campaign in places such as Michigan and Wisconsin, spending her time schmoozing with talk show hosts and A-list celebrities, the kind of campaign someone would wage if they didn't have to schlepp it out into the heartland. And she paid the price on Election Day.

So when Hillary Clinton said that, I remember thinking to myself, 'There goes Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Ohio.' Coal miners had traditionally been loyal Democratic voters, the kind of guys who filed into the polls and voted for Obama twice. But the policy wonks on the coasts kind of forgot they existed. In fact, the Kentucky gubernatorial election in 2015 should have been a harbinger. Those coal counties, once dependable Democratic votes, went Republican after suffering mightily at the hands of new environmental regulations sluicing out of Washington. Yet Clinton was out there prating on and on about shutting down more coal mines five months later.

Ditching the Electoral College, if anything, means that those guys get marginalized even more. Not everyone can live in the BosWash corridor or write code out in Silicon Valley. There are people who farm, work in factories, and otherwise get their hands dirty every day. In their eyes, it's not just the bankers and Wall Street who are the culprits. It's the pointy-headed bureaucrats in DC, the guys who have a well-paid job for life.

If you don't understand why Donald Trump won (And, trust me, I didn't vote for the guy either) or thought it was because American overnight turned into a howling mob of racists, then you are pretty much Exhibit A why the Electoral College should exist in the first place.

Last edited by MinivanDriver; 09-18-2017 at 05:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 05:38 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,019 posts, read 16,978,303 times
Reputation: 30143
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinivanDriver View Post
Ditching the Electoral College, if anything, means that those guys get marginalized even more. Not everyone can live in the BosWash corridor or write code out in Silicon Valley. There are people who farm, work in factories, and otherwise get their hands dirty every day. In their eyes, it's not just the bankers and Wall Street who are the culprits. It's the pointy-headed bureaucrats in DC, the guys who have a well-paid job for life.
But don't you understand, the elites enjoy and are entitled to power?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 06:45 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,776 posts, read 24,277,952 times
Reputation: 32918
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinivanDriver View Post
People always want to throw the Electoral College out when they get a vote they don't like.

In truth, the wisdom of the Electoral College is apparent to me. It keeps candidates from simply flogging the population centers and instead forces them to campaign out in what some people call Flyover Land. It also keeps politicians from ignoring the needs of those in those states.

...
So instead, they don't go to major cities in solidly blue or solidly red states. Thus ignoring huge segments of the population.

And not only that, how many candidates campaigned in Eureka, Nevada or Bluff, Utah or Wolf Point, Montana?

And "when they get a vote they don't like"...as if that happens frequently. I have opposed to the EC since I was in junior high, and that was half a century ago. Don't such broad characterizations of people. Let's face it, Republicans like it the way it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 07:18 PM
 
10,501 posts, read 7,031,187 times
Reputation: 32344
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
So instead, they don't go to major cities in solidly blue or solidly red states. Thus ignoring huge segments of the population.

And not only that, how many candidates campaigned in Eureka, Nevada or Bluff, Utah or Wolf Point, Montana?

And "when they get a vote they don't like"...as if that happens frequently. I have opposed to the EC since I was in junior high, and that was half a century ago. Don't such broad characterizations of people. Let's face it, Republicans like it the way it is.
That's a ridiculous statement.

I'm not a Republican. However, I do live in flyover land.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 08:18 PM
 
22 posts, read 13,247 times
Reputation: 134
If changes are to occur concerning the Electoral College, then Article 5 of the US Constitution needs to be activated....otherwise, that's the way the President/Vice-President is elected!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,776 posts, read 24,277,952 times
Reputation: 32918
Quote:
Originally Posted by MinivanDriver View Post
That's a ridiculous statement.

I'm not a Republican. However, I do live in flyover land.
Really? How much time did Hillary or Donald spend in L.A. (in general campaigning, not fundraising), SFC, New York, Boston, and the major cities of NYS? (And yes, I know Hillary kicked off her campaign in NYC, but that was for the visuals). I'm talking about general campaigning.

What are you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 09:13 PM
 
10,501 posts, read 7,031,187 times
Reputation: 32344
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Really? How much time did Hillary or Donald spend in L.A. (in general campaigning, not fundraising), SFC, New York, Boston, and the major cities of NYS? (And yes, I know Hillary kicked off her campaign in NYC, but that was for the visuals). I'm talking about general campaigning.

What are you?
I'm a militant independent. When someone tells me they are a Democrat or Republican, I tend to look for their lobotomy scars.

Actually, if you were a student of the 2016 campaign, you'd realize that Hillary actually didn't campaign in several key states such as Wisconsin.

Trump didn't campaign in California or NY. But he did go to dependable Democratic strongholds such as NJ, WA, CT, NV and IA during the general campaign. Meanwhile, Clinton stuck to traditional Democratic power centers.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...one-handy-gif/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2017, 09:35 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,019 posts, read 16,978,303 times
Reputation: 30143
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Really? How much time did Hillary or Donald spend in L.A. (in general campaigning, not fundraising), SFC, New York, Boston, and the major cities of NYS? (And yes, I know Hillary kicked off her campaign in NYC, but that was for the visuals). I'm talking about general campaigning.

What are you?
They spend lots of time in NYC and LA fundraising. And Hillary has her marital bliss home in Chappaqua, New York.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top