Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-21-2009, 11:23 AM
 
4,610 posts, read 11,102,781 times
Reputation: 6832

Advertisements

I read this post a couple of days ago. Then last night when I was flipping the channels I came to CNN with Anderson Cooper "Planet in Peril" and they were talking about this exact same subject regarding the plants along the ship channel in Houston.

I missed the beginning of the show and the end. But the part of the show that I did see was that some chemicals in the pollution from that location in Houston was causing child leukemia (The rate was EXTREMELY high). Then they were saying that where there is such dangerous chemical pollution is in the poorer communities because the wealthier communities would fight and have the plant...etc shut down (which makes sense). So definitely something serious is going on there. They were talking about a neighborhood that is right next the plants. I don't remember the name of the neighborhood as I don't live in the Houston area so the name didn't stay with me. But I'm pretty sure you could look this up with CNN if you were more interested.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-21-2009, 12:12 PM
 
Location: A little suburb of Houston
3,702 posts, read 18,216,670 times
Reputation: 2092
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roma View Post
I read this post a couple of days ago. Then last night when I was flipping the channels I came to CNN with Anderson Cooper "Planet in Peril" and they were talking about this exact same subject regarding the plants along the ship channel in Houston.

I missed the beginning of the show and the end. But the part of the show that I did see was that some chemicals in the pollution from that location in Houston was causing child leukemia (The rate was EXTREMELY high). Then they were saying that where there is such dangerous chemical pollution is in the poorer communities because the wealthier communities would fight and have the plant...etc shut down (which makes sense). So definitely something serious is going on there. They were talking about a neighborhood that is right next the plants. I don't remember the name of the neighborhood as I don't live in the Houston area so the name didn't stay with me. But I'm pretty sure you could look this up with CNN if you were more interested.

The neighborhood you are speaking of is the Milby Park/Manchester area right at 610 and 225. In 2005, the major problem there was found to be 1,3-Butadiene originating from the facilities on the south side of 225. This has not been a problem for a year or two now.
The article, while good, is slanted a bit. It gives you total unpermitted emissions for a period of 6.5 years. It does NOT show that those emissions were more extensive in the first 2 years than in the last 2 years. It would be a problem if they admitted that improvements have been occurring. Further, the article discusses the state emission event reporting regulations and gives numbers of enforcement etc. but does not discuss changes to those laws and enforcement policies made midway through the data collection period listed. These changes have resulted in increased enforcement compared to 10 years ago. Also while concentrating on emission event rules and investigation, it does not discuss other programs like TERP, etc. that have been occurring over the past years and caused emission reductions. Just a few examples.
While it isn't a perfect picture and more can certainly be done (and we should push for it), I think there should be some acknowledgement to how much better things have gotten over the past 20...well, even 10 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2009, 12:40 PM
 
Location: The land of sugar... previously Houston and Austin
5,429 posts, read 14,844,510 times
Reputation: 3672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poltracker View Post
While it isn't a perfect picture and more can certainly be done (and we should push for it), I think there should be some acknowledgement to how much better things have gotten over the past 20...well, even 10 years.
Exactly! But good luck. That would mean some admitting something positive about Houston, which unfortunately, isn't the "hip" thing to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2009, 12:14 AM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,119,861 times
Reputation: 2037
Living next to one of the nation's largest petrocomplex complexes and a major port causes a higher rate of incidence of cancer and other pollution-related ailments?

... brilliant!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top