Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-14-2015, 08:23 PM
 
2,420 posts, read 4,368,878 times
Reputation: 3528

Advertisements

The amount of medical procedures is vast, and other than routine office visits and few minor procedures, they are too numerous and technical in many cases to be understood by a lay person. It would be nice if we all could have a full understanding of all medical procedures, but unfortunately today we can not.

So although it might be nice to be able to deal directly with the provider of the service, this is just not possible in all cases. I don't necessarily agree with the analogy posed before with laser surgery. Yes the procedure has been simplified and is easier to perform than ever, so the price may have come down as new technology has been developed. But look at dental work. You go to the dentist and deal with him/her directly (unless you have insurance) They give you an estimate for the work, and you can take it or leave it. The chances are VERY good without insurance though, you will pay more for the same procedure. In other words the dentist will give a better price for the insurance company than they will to you. So with dental work, you as the consumer come out worse, when you are trying to go it alone. The same applies to lab work. You as an individual can pay over ten times what an insurance company is willing to pay for lab work.

I don't know what your experience has been with dental work in recent years, but I can tell you the cost has risen four fold over the last five to ten years. And that is working directly with the provider. So we do need a gatekeeper for cost control. What we don't need is 50,000 different insurance policies for doctors to deal with , all with different payout ratios.

Medicare obtains better costs generally speaking, because there is power in it's size. Most doctors (with the exception of general practitioners) would never dream of turning away medicare patients as it represents a very substantial part of their practice. This would be exemplified ten fold if we had single payer. Scandalous coding practices are a problem, especially when you are dealing with multiple different insurance companies, with different coding practices for different policies.

There is a lot to be said for standard pricing and coding, and huge potential for reform when pricing is standardized. We can't go back to the chicken in exchange for services now, so we must adapt to modern times. Consider this.

Why should a procedure requiring hospitalization in Norway or Switzerland, cost less than 1/2 and sometimes a third what it does here in the US. Norway as an example has an extremely high standard of living. There wages across the board are much higher than that of the US. Yet, they are able to provide the same services that we receive here for a much lower cost. Their doctors are well compensated. Their hospitals are state of the art. Real estate cost are three time higher than here in the US. And goods and services are generally more expensive there. But health care is not (compared to the US)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-14-2015, 08:54 PM
 
2,420 posts, read 4,368,878 times
Reputation: 3528
This is my subject, so please forgive the multiple posts this once.

Taiwan was one of the later countries to adapt a single payer system. They wanted to get it right and not repeat the mistakes of other countries, yet they wanted their system to work for their country. So they put together a group of medical doctors, hospital and health care administrators, and sent them to about six or seven different countries to examine their health care delivery system up close and personal.

This group went into the hospitals and talked to the doctors, the nurses, the patients, and administrators. They met with the key government officials in charge of health care ad-ministry. They observed operations, acute care wards and all aspects of health care delivery. They made notes of all of their findings noting the good and bad. When they were all done, them came back to Taiwan, with their reports and sat down to devise a plan taking from the best of what they saw, while minimizing the bad.

That is how Taiwan did it. Now why can't we do the same? Why can't we go to Norway, and Sweden, France, Germany and Great Britain, and do the same. Find all the holes in our system, and devise a plan to remedy the ills of our system. Is it a big undertaking. You betcha. Can it be done. Of course it can. The only thing lacking is the will to do it.

The reason we don't have the will is because the healthcare, insurance, and pharmaceutical companies call the shots in our country and have been successful in making health care a political issue and dividing Americans, who would otherwise insist on it's implementation if they had the real facts instead of all the fear mongering promoted by their PR firms hired to cause decention among us. They know just how to do it. They know exactly how to keep us divided and the maintain the status quo for the corporations.

Last edited by modhatter; 10-14-2015 at 09:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2015, 11:12 PM
 
13,586 posts, read 13,115,850 times
Reputation: 17786
Quote:
Originally Posted by modhatter View Post
This is my subject, so please forgive the multiple posts this once.

Taiwan was one of the later countries to adapt a single payer system. They wanted to get it right and not repeat the mistakes of other countries, yet they wanted their system to work for their country. So they put together a group of medical doctors, hospital and health care administrators, and sent them to about six or seven different countries to examine their health care delivery system up close and personal.

This group went into the hospitals and talked to the doctors, the nurses, the patients, and administrators. They met with the key government officials in charge of health care ad-ministry. They observed operations, acute care wards and all aspects of health care delivery. They made notes of all of their findings noting the good and bad. When they were all done, them came back to Taiwan, with their reports and sat down to devise a plan taking from the best of what they saw, while minimizing the bad.

That is how Taiwan did it. Now why can't we do the same? Why can't we go to Norway, and Sweden, France, Germany and Great Britain, and do the same. Find all the holes in our system, and devise a plan to remedy the ills of our system. Is it a big undertaking. You betcha. Can it be done. Of course it can. The only thing lacking is the will to do it.

The reason we don't have the will is because the healthcare, insurance, and pharmaceutical companies call the shots in our country and have been successful in making health care a political issue and dividing Americans, who would otherwise insist on it's implementation if they had the real facts instead of all the fear mongering promoted by their PR firms hired to cause decention among us. They know just how to do it. They know exactly how to keep us divided and the maintain the status quo for the corporations.
This.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2015, 04:18 AM
 
Location: Sunrise
10,864 posts, read 16,990,912 times
Reputation: 9084
Quote:
Originally Posted by modhatter View Post
That is how Taiwan did it. Now why can't we do the same?
Because we're not Taiwan. Taiwan is one of the best countries on the planet. I cannot think of a nation that is more grounded in the realistic governmental approach of "What works? What doesn't? Let's implement that which works and cast aside that which doesn't" than Taiwan.

That and the fact we spend more on defense* than the next 10 biggest-spenders combined.



* We should be honest with ourselves and rename it the Department of Offense. A sword is different than a shield, after all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 12:07 PM
 
698 posts, read 985,773 times
Reputation: 574
Received an email from my insurance agent telling me to plan on a 20% increase in my rates and I'll have to select a new plan again as the plan I'm currently on won't be available next year. I'm losing count but I think since Obama told me if I liked my plan I could keep it I've had to change plans 4 maybe 5 times now. The Dr. I was told I could keep I've had to change twice and I think with this new price increase I'm probably coming close to 3x what my premium was when he delivered the great news. I've lost track of how much our deductibles have increased. Even Slick Willie thinks this is crazy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Southern Highlands
2,413 posts, read 2,029,490 times
Reputation: 2236
Quote:
Even Slick Willie thinks this is crazy!
Even a career politician will occasionally say what he really thinks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 07:24 PM
 
589 posts, read 390,699 times
Reputation: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cold Warrior View Post
Even a career politician will occasionally say what he really thinks.
Word is Obama n Klintons were in cahoots. Now Hillary can ride in on a donkey and implement single payer( the objective all along).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2016, 10:25 AM
 
Location: In a secret bunker under the Cannery
1,078 posts, read 1,152,683 times
Reputation: 796
I for one fear single-payer system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2016, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Paranoid State
13,044 posts, read 13,863,648 times
Reputation: 15839
Quote:
Originally Posted by robojester View Post
I for one fear single-payer system.
I don't fear a single-payer system. I fear paying for that single-payer system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2016, 10:45 AM
 
Location: In a secret bunker under the Cannery
1,078 posts, read 1,152,683 times
Reputation: 796
since I currently have no insurance what are people using for a low cost option. Nothing from the exchange even seems worth having that I can afford.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top