Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-09-2019, 04:05 PM
 
23,931 posts, read 19,135,410 times
Reputation: 10925

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 495neighbor View Post
It is ideal to live close to an area one might want to socialize in. I know from experience, there was always a density factor when I was doing OLD. When I lived in Acton, men who lived inside 128 were reluctant to pursue once they found out I lived outside the belt, whether it was all the way downtown or Lexington, only 8 miles away. However, I would get hit on by those 100 miles into Central Mass or New Hampshire.

I also dated someone in NYC long distance. It was difficult to keep that going despite both of our efforts.

If the OP lives in Marlborough, I'm afraid going to NYC or Providence or Boston on weekends won't be enough, and they may end up feeling rather isolated.
If you replaced Worcester with Boston I would agree. My point is while Worcester may be a notch or two above Marlborough/Hudson in the density factor, it's really only just "that" much more. The question is, if it's an advantage enough to make the commute worthwhile? Anecdotally, the limited single scene of that whole area kind of overlaps. People in Marlborough/Hudson often consider Worcester as part of their dating orbit. Likewise I know people from Worcester who have dated people in Shrewsbury, the Boros, or even Milford. So yes one would be more likely to socialize locally if they live in Worcester vs. Marlborough, but chances are also good that he could move to Worcester and wind up getting hits in Hudson. Saying all that, Worcester would be cheaper than MarlboroughHudson and that as a factor also might not make it a bad idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top