Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-29-2016, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,584 posts, read 84,795,337 times
Reputation: 115120

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
based on the pictures and my experience with the station it would seem the train would have had to had significant momentum to break through. Isnt there a barrier at the end


tragic none the less
From all accounts, it was going too fast, not slowing as a train would when it's chugging into the terminal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-29-2016, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,216 posts, read 11,335,819 times
Reputation: 20828
As has been my custom, I'm posting a link to a site frequented by operating railroaders and knowledgeable railroad buffs:

RAILROAD.NET • View topic - NJT HOBOKEN TERMINAL ACCIDENT THREAD

I can verify only this much: Hoboken is what is known as a "stub" station -- only one line in or out. The trains stop at the end of the track, load and unload, and reverse for another trip -- or go to the "coach yard" until the evening rush hour.

Apparently, the train failed to stop and plowed into the bumping post at the end of the track. These are usually very substantial; hence the first car was likely ripped open and the injuries very serious. There was a very similar accident in Washington's Union Station back in 1953, but in that case, the train went through a wall into a vacant room, the floor of which then collapsed (happily, no one died in that wreck).

So at this point, the big question is why the incoming train didn't (or maybe couldn't) stop.

The Washington accident, BTW, was eventually attributed to an air brake failure, and the engineer completely exonerated. No guarantee that that's what happened here, but let's not rush to judgement.

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 09-29-2016 at 10:11 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 09:50 AM
 
1,384 posts, read 1,754,022 times
Reputation: 1846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
I just heard someone sayon TV that car services are charging up to $80 for trips to Manhattan because of all the commuters stranded with PATH and NJT shut down.

What dickwads people are.
The AG will go after them for price gouging, don't worry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 10:06 AM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,705,684 times
Reputation: 25616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
From all accounts, it was going too fast, not slowing as a train would when it's chugging into the terminal.
Time for NJ Transit to automate trains with computer drivers. Can't trust humans at the wheel.

I bet Christie is happy that bridgegate is not gonna be headlines anymore. He'll be front and center trying to sort this one out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,216 posts, read 11,335,819 times
Reputation: 20828
Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
Time for NJ Transit to automate trains with computer drivers. Can't trust humans at the wheel.

I bet Christie is happy that bridgegate is not gonna be headlines anymore. He'll be front and center trying to sort this one out.
Locomotives have a throttle; not a wheel, to paraphrase Mr. Dylan, don't criticize what you won't take some time to learn about.

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 09-29-2016 at 10:25 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 10:13 AM
 
Location: NJ
378 posts, read 587,063 times
Reputation: 439
The title of this thread is sensationalist. The terminal did not collapse. It was struck and damaged. Neither did the trainshed collapse. It too was damaged.

I'm not there, but I've yet to hear that anything has collapsed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 10:15 AM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,584 posts, read 84,795,337 times
Reputation: 115120
Quote:
Originally Posted by pruebas View Post
The title of this thread is sensationalist. The terminal did not collapse. It was struck and damaged. Neither did the trainshed collapse. It too was damaged.

I'm not there, but I've yet to hear that anything has collapsed.
Part of the roof over the tracks collapsed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 10:49 AM
 
Location: NYC
20,550 posts, read 17,705,684 times
Reputation: 25616
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
Locomotives have a throttle; not a wheel, to paraphrase Mr. Dylan, don't criticize what you won't take some time to learn about.
I meant falling asleep at the wheel quite literally as a commonly used phrase. Besides what difference does it make, people are dead and you are only concerned about linguistic accuracy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 10:57 AM
 
12,883 posts, read 13,990,431 times
Reputation: 18451
Quote:
Originally Posted by pruebas View Post
The title of this thread is sensationalist. The terminal did not collapse. It was struck and damaged. Neither did the trainshed collapse. It too was damaged.

I'm not there, but I've yet to hear that anything has collapsed.
The terminal has sustained heavy damage. Part of the roof did collapse (it's in pictures) and from what I understand the train went at least partially through the building. Apparently they are dealing with people who were crushed by falling debris.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-29-2016, 11:06 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,647,591 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by newdude05 View Post
my question is do they even have a automatic safety system to stop the train at the hoboken station deadend ramp.
Not that I know of. However they do have an system that will stop the train if the engineer is not holding the throttle. So, if he/she has a heart attack or something, the train will slow and stop automatically.

The problem is, it takes 60 seconds to activate. Besides going too fast approaching the station (that's what I heard anyway), if the engineer had a health problem 50 seconds before entering the station, the safety would not engage in time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top