Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-24-2009, 06:55 PM
 
Location: ATL via ROC
1,214 posts, read 2,327,364 times
Reputation: 2578

Advertisements

Where do you see New York State in 30 years? What will be the 5 largest cities in the State? What will the States population be? How will the economy be? etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-25-2009, 07:26 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,450,395 times
Reputation: 3647
Official estimates say the population peaks at 20,000,000 in 2020 and declines thereafter. And if current trends persist then they will. But as oil becomes more and more expensive and fresh water becomes more and more rare I think New York could rebound.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2009, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Live in NY, work in CT
11,305 posts, read 18,899,294 times
Reputation: 5131
About 30 years ago NY was all ready to become a giant version of Detroit and Michigan but what saved it in the NY City region was the 80s Wall Street renassaince.

I think continued decline both population and economically except maybe in the NY City area. I say "maybe" to that because it depends on the health of the financial industry and to what extent foreigners continue to come to NY, be it as poor immigrants or as the wealthy buying up Manhattan real estate. NYC was always an expensive place to be, and it is more than ever and I think without an uber-wealthy industry like Wall St. booming to fuel that we could see another 1970s style collapse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2009, 11:17 AM
 
93,412 posts, read 124,084,833 times
Reputation: 18273
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
Official estimates say the population peaks at 20,000,000 in 2020 and declines thereafter. And if current trends persist then they will. But as oil becomes more and more expensive and fresh water becomes more and more rare I think New York could rebound.
I this is where Upstate NY can actually come back. We have some natural resources here that will be in demand as the nation's population increases. I believe there is a possibility that there are some parts of the state will see some drilling for natural gas in the near future too. New York state releases Marcellus shale drilling proposal - Oil & Gas Journal

City challenges state over upstate oil drilling - New York News - Runnin' Scared

WNYC - News - Natural Gas Drilling: Is New York Ready?

I think that the population will slowly, but steadily increase for NY State.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2009, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Rochester, NY
1,293 posts, read 5,000,405 times
Reputation: 369
If two things remain the same, NY tax policy and NYC being the countries financial capital, things will remain virtually the same. Upstate NY will continue to decline and NYC will always be up and down as the US economy waxes and wanes. Things like population growth in NYC may change slightly over the years, but as long as it has it's financial power, it will continue to be important.

Some of the Upstate regions have natural resources, some are already being used. But is it enough? Drilling for gas is great, but it is dirty, we want to move away from dirty industry and go into the more profitable biomedical research and manufacturing. As near as I can tell, a large offshore oil rig employs up to 200 people (no exact source). Thats the size of a small manufacturing company. The other problem is the contamination of drinking water. We already have the largest supply of fresh water in the world, if that gets screwed up, we affect tens of millions of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2009, 01:04 PM
 
93,412 posts, read 124,084,833 times
Reputation: 18273
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese9988 View Post
If two things remain the same, NY tax policy and NYC being the countries financial capital, things will remain virtually the same. Upstate NY will continue to decline and NYC will always be up and down as the US economy waxes and wanes. Things like population growth in NYC may change slightly over the years, but as long as it has it's financial power, it will continue to be important.

Some of the Upstate regions have natural resources, some are already being used. But is it enough? Drilling for gas is great, but it is dirty, we want to move away from dirty industry and go into the more profitable biomedical research and manufacturing. As near as I can tell, a large offshore oil rig employs up to 200 people (no exact source). Thats the size of a small manufacturing company. The other problem is the contamination of drinking water. We already have the largest supply of fresh water in the world, if that gets screwed up, we affect tens of millions of people.
Good points on your last paragraph. I know some parts of the state, like Syracuse, is getting into more Green technology and energy. So, it will be interesting to see if parts of the state will go one way or the other, if not a little bit of both dirty and green energy.


I wonder if the Buffalo area, with the potential of power output, will be an area that gets more involved with that industry and researching new ways to use that industry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2009, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Rochester, NY
1,293 posts, read 5,000,405 times
Reputation: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhthankgod View Post
Good points on your last paragraph. I know some parts of the state, like Syracuse, is getting into more Green technology and energy. So, it will be interesting to see if parts of the state will go one way or the other, if not a little bit of both dirty and green energy.


I wonder if the Buffalo area, with the potential of power output, will be an area that gets more involved with that industry and researching new ways to use that industry.
Buffalo has some high tech industry already...Greatbatch Medical, ITT, Northrup Grumman, Calspan, to name a few, but it needs to build up more. The medical industry is far more stable, they may loose jobs due to the economy, but nothing like the automotive, service sector and financial jobs. People will need health care, medicine and medical devices even with a complete financial breakdown.

Niagara Falls in terms of power, really isn't beneficial as it used to be. It is green energy, however, you can set up nuclear/coal power plants anywhere these days. Niagara Falls put up against all of the other power plants in the state is relatively small.

This lists a bunch, but not all of them:
power plant ny state - Google Maps
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2009, 07:52 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,450,395 times
Reputation: 3647
We also shouldn't forget Albany's booming nanotech business. Albany leads the entire world in nanotech research.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2009, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Live in NY, work in CT
11,305 posts, read 18,899,294 times
Reputation: 5131
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
We also shouldn't forget Albany's booming nanotech business. Albany leads the entire world in nanotech research.
While it may be the leader, I think of lot of how that will affect Albany will depend on how much it grows as an industry. My alma mater (RPI) back when I graduated in the late 80s was trying to push an "incubator tech park" to promote high tech industry in the Capital Region and while it still exists, I'd hardly call it "the next Silicon Valley". Yes, MapInfo (one of its first tenants) stayed in the region, but I remember back then they were literally begging to get Sematech, and they chose Austin because of the climate, tax structure and quality of life (though in some ways I'm not sure QOL is really better down there).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2009, 12:00 PM
 
4,135 posts, read 10,819,190 times
Reputation: 2698
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckhthankgod View Post

I wonder if the Buffalo area, with the potential of power output, will be an area that gets more involved with that industry and researching new ways to use that industry.
Buffalo and Niagara Falls would be a darn sight better off if most of the power came here and didn't go to NYC.

My power [NYSEG elec} comes not from the Falls [30 min away] but from the Kinzua Dam [a few hours away].

Two things could easily help this area:
1) More hydro power from the Falls ( less than 5% of the water is actually diverted)
2) The hydro power being used here, not downstate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top