Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-01-2010, 09:21 AM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,327,483 times
Reputation: 7026

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by aspiesmom View Post
I love it, corporations are hating corporate health insurance...Obama's plan is working, we'll have Single Payer sooner than I thought
And a government bureaucrat denying you life saving care because you're a lousy bet. In England they have something called a 'Quality-Adjusted Life Year'. Basically, if the cost of a procedure, drug, or treatment will cost more than about $40,000 for every year you're likely to live longer because of said procedure, drug, or treatment they deny it to you. That makes it not a medical decision but a governmental bureaucratic one. ObamaCare will have all the compassion of the IRS and all the efficiency of the Post Office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-01-2010, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,835,417 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavaturaccioli View Post
And a government bureaucrat denying you life saving care because you're a lousy bet. In England they have something called a 'Quality-Adjusted Life Year'. Basically, if the cost of a procedure, drug, or treatment will cost more than about $40,000 for every year you're likely to live longer because of said procedure, drug, or treatment they deny it to you. That makes it not a medical decision but a governmental bureaucratic one. ObamaCare will have all the compassion of the IRS and all the efficiency of the Post Office.
Yeah not like here where life saving care is denied because of ability to pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2010, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Clearwater Florida
294 posts, read 351,576 times
Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Yeah not like here where life saving care is denied because of ability to pay.
Is there any signifigant difference in whether or not you can't come up with the money or the government deems you a poor risk? The major difference is that those rich bass-turds could pay for a needed procedure, until 2014, when it will no longer be allowed under the current healthcare reform. I guess that's social justice? Money will be useless to those who have the most, unless they are willing to hop on a plane and make some overseas doctor wealthy. Isn't this the equivelent of shipping jobs overseas?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2010, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,327,483 times
Reputation: 7026
Quote:
Originally Posted by R.J. MacReady View Post
But then why cut out benefits for the adult long term workers? If they have so many part time student workers then it shouldn't cost that much to offer decent (not shabby as it's being reported for the benefits they do offer) benefits for the ones who deserve it. The average McDonalds restaurant open at least a year had sales of $2.3 million in 2008. I guess it's too much to ask for decent health coverage. They still will be making millions.....it all comes down to greed.
You make it sound like $2.3 million is sales is $2.3 million in walking away money. Subtract salaries, payroll taxes, real estate taxes, food cost, insurance, franchise fees, napkins, condiments, signage, electricity, gas, telephone, legal services, and the rest of the almost innumerable costs of doing business and you're talking about an annual salary in the low six figures -all for an investment (aka risk) of over half a million dollars. Easy Street it ain't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2010, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,327,483 times
Reputation: 7026
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillaryC View Post
Funny that McDonalds must provide health care insurance in Europe etc. , must pay much more in wages and still has huge record profit margins over there.

They do it because they can do it here. Not because they can't afford it. The U.S. allows them to exploit employees BIG TIME.
A major reason profits are higher is because overseas companies don't have to pay the US's absurdly high corporate tax rates (2nd highest in the world, only Japan's is higher and they're hurting because of it) unless and until they repatriate the money. I'd love to know how much a typical meal costs there as opposed to here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2010, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,451,194 times
Reputation: 5047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
Unless regulators waive a requirement of the health-care overhaul, McDonald’s has warned federal regulators it could drop its health insurance plan for almost 30,000 hourly workers, The Wall Street Journal reported.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Uh, not so fast.

McDonald's Threatens To Cut Skimpy Health Plans : Shots - Health News Blog : NPR

Update: Steve Russell, Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer at McDonald's USA released a statement last night that says, in part:

Media reports stating that we plan to drop health care coverage for our employees are completely false...McDonald's is committed to providing competitive pay and benefits, and the strongest employment opportunities possible.
Another widely inaccurate thread title. Nice catch, Katiana.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2010, 09:43 AM
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
6,476 posts, read 7,327,483 times
Reputation: 7026
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Yeah not like here where life saving care is denied because of ability to pay.
I see patients on a daily basis who have little or no money getting procedures with four figure price tags. Either Medicaid pays, they have supplemental insurance, or they take a payment plan and pay what they can. In any case we see them and treat them. There are municipal and charity hospitals in every city and town in America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2010, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,835,417 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by rikensquire View Post
Is there any signifigant difference in whether or not you can't come up with the money or the government deems you a poor risk? The major difference is that those rich bass-turds could pay for a needed procedure, until 2014, when it will no longer be allowed under the current healthcare reform. I guess that's social justice? Money will be useless to those who have the most, unless they are willing to hop on a plane and make some overseas doctor wealthy. Isn't this the equivelent of shipping jobs overseas?
Yes, the difference is curable, young, and productive members of our country are being denied life saving medical treatment according to ability to pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2010, 10:01 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,586,907 times
Reputation: 29291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
Uh, not so fast.

McDonald's Threatens To Cut Skimpy Health Plans : Shots - Health News Blog : NPR

Update: Steve Russell, Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer at McDonald's USA released a statement last night that says, in part:

Media reports stating that we plan to drop health care coverage for our employees are completely false...McDonald's is committed to providing competitive pay and benefits, and the strongest employment opportunities possible.


It should be noted that McDonald's lifetime caps start at $2000, the price of one ER visit.
the WSJ reporting that mcdonalds may cut its healthcare plans led to squeals about rupert murdoch and the loss of the WSJ's credibility.

when NPR says pretty much the same thing - dead silence.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2010, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,835,417 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavaturaccioli View Post
I see patients on a daily basis who have little or no money getting procedures with four figure price tags. Either Medicaid pays, they have supplemental insurance, or they take a payment plan and pay what they can. In any case we see them and treat them. There are municipal and charity hospitals in every city and town in America.
Fail.


YouTube - Rural Idaho Stories: living without health insurance-Part 1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top