Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What if a straight person falls in love with someone they can't marry? Maybe a 2nd wife? Someone underage? What if the person they fall in love with doesn't return the love?
To be perfectly honest here, if the second wife (and the first) are into polygamy and there isn't some kind of crazy cult thing going on with it where the women are more or less slaves, then I really don't care.
I really love, though, how you're reverting to the pedophilia thing. Because pedophilia is totally comparable with a relationship between two consenting adults.
Again... CONSENTING adults.
Last edited by emi__; 10-06-2010 at 04:19 PM..
Reason: Detail clarification.
Oh, yea, thats why all over the country there are hetero bars where a dozen or so people are in the toilet at all times having anal sex with someone whose name they don't even know.
Straight guys never get blowjobs from anonymous women they meet in nightculbs.
So you seem to think that a special law stating that gay people can get married is "MORE FAIR"? what about the polygamist? Is a law allowing that going to follow?
Bottom line is that we all have the right to marry--the question is whom and how. You want to be able to marry people of the same gender---something none of us have. That's not "equal" right---that's "special" rights--as they apply to only a very small fringe minority.
From a legal standpoint you have this situation completely reversed. By NOT allowing same-sex marriage you are creating a special class of people as defined by Supreme Court precedents and treating them differently by discriminating against them. This is exactly why Proposition 9 in California was overturned in federal court.
From a legal standpoint you have this situation completely reversed. By NOT allowing same-sex marriage you are creating a special class of people as defined by Supreme Court precedents and treating them differently by discriminating against them. This is exactly why Proposition 9 in California was overturned in federal court.
-sigh- Hopefully you can get that point through.....
You want to be able to marry people of the same gender---something none of us have. That's not "equal" right---that's "special" rights--as they apply to only a very small fringe minority.
Wrong. It's an expansion of rights for everybody. No matter what your sexual orientation is, you would have a right to marry someone of the same sex or of the opposite sex. It's about freedom and liberty for all.
It's usually closeted men with girlfriends or wives who do those things.
I go to an a gym where 95% of the clientele are gay men. You might think that the bathrooms and showers would be very active, but they're not. This is because most of the guys who go to this gym are out of the closet. They have no need to fool around in inappropriate places because they have nothing to hide.
I do have a qualification on this subject. For 20 years I represented the largest gay dance bar in my town as their attorney. I know far more about this than I would ever want to know. And, far more about it than anyone other than the recepticles of this sexual activity.
And, as a single hetero guy for the several of the sexual revolution's most outrageous periods, I think I can say with confidence that there is absolutely no comparison with the disgusting, dysfunctional, and unhealthy activity of gays compared to straights. Having said that, it is their business and not mine. But to compare the sexual risk factors of gays to straights, is ridiculous.
I think I can say with confidence that there is absolutely no comparison with the disgusting, dysfunctional, and unhealthy activity of gays compared to straights..
Every word in that sentence is subjective. You should know that being an attorney and all.
Here is what is not subjective. Sex crimes are committed more frequently by heterosexual males than homosexual ones. It is a fact, not an opinion.
Every word in that sentence is subjective. You should know that being an attorney and all.
Here is what is not subjective. Sex crimes are committed more frequently by heterosexual males than homosexual ones. It is a fact, not an opinion.
Quoted for truth.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wrong. It's an expansion of rights for everybody. No matter what your sexual orientation is, you would have a right to marry someone of the same sex or of the opposite sex. It's about freedom and liberty for all.
