Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
agree 100%, I suggest the someone intentionally leaving out the word CONTROL from that quotation has ZERO credibility and should begin the healing process by making an apology for being so dishonest.
Forget the fact that Saddam was using poison gas on the Kurds, forget that the USA was giving the Kurds cover, forget that Bush's rational for invading Iraq had ZERO to do with al qaeda... this nonsense is beginning to sound like Bush, "let's shape and cherry pick the evidence to support my predetermined conclusions".
another EPIC FAIL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA
This has to be a joke. Your own post:
Not "outside of Baghdad". "Outside of Baghdad's control". In Kurdistan. An area - now, please savor the irony - an area not controlled by Baghdad thanks in no little part to the US/UK no-fly zones.
I am sure Saddam Hussein would allow America to do a house-to-house search of his country looking for "leads" to Osama Bin Laden
Saddam Hussein SUPPORTED terrorism. He paid the families of suicide bombers.
So did Reagan with the Death Squads in Latin America. We've supported such activities in foreign countries for decades, meddling with their internal affairs.
Don't try to stretch something imaginary and present it as a reality that somehow Saddam was in a cozy relationship with Osama, or Al Qaeda in general.
So did Reagan with the Death Squads in Latin America. We've supported such activities in foreign countries for decades, meddling with their internal affairs.
Don't try to stretch something imaginary and present it as a reality that somehow Saddam was in a cozy relationship with Osama, or Al Qaeda in general.
Saddam Hussein had been firing at US planes patrolling the No-Fly Zone since the war ended in 1991. He had to be taken out so that he could not interfere with the operations in Afghanistan.
I am not in the inner circle of the CIA or government so I have no way of knowing what the truth is as to how this person was discovered. Do I accept it at face value it was through Iraq...no.... nor do I comment of things I don't have a clue about... guess you think the left does the same thing the right does.
We see just nothing to say because who really knows?
Saddam Hussein had been firing at US planes patrolling the No-Fly Zone since the war ended in 1991. He had to be taken out so that he could not interfere with the operations in Afghanistan.
Among the long list of pathetic excuses for invading Iraq, where does this rank?
George W. Bush deserves as much credit, or more, as Barack Obama for the killing of Osama Bin Laden. This is especially important to note as liberals try in vein to de-glorify Bush while putting Barack Obama on a pedestal during this election season.
George W. Bush deserves as much credit, or more, as Barack Obama for the killing of Osama Bin Laden. This is especially important to note as liberals try in vein to de-glorify Bush while putting Barack Obama on a pedestal during this election season.
Really, how so?
Bush joined the seals?
The credit, my friend goes to the people who were actually there, not the CIC who signed the orders.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
