Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oral sex can be performed by anyone regardless of their sexual orientation. Some people don't like it, some do. Oral cancer as the result of infection with HPV is on the upswing as well.
The thought of anal sex makes my skin crawl. Anal cancer is also on the upswing (in women - same culprit HPV).
Frankly, I think women give in to the demands of their men for their pleasure, more than for their own. Not to mention that many men love porn, and anal sex is depicted in a lot of porn. So some women will give in to their partner's demands and "pretend" as if they enjoy something knowing deep down inside that it is vile. It's about "bonding".
Spoiler
Furthermore, if I had a guy asking me for anal sex, I'd wonder where he'd been and where his true sexual attraction lies. Women don't have a prostate, not much sense in anything going "in" an "out" channel on a female. On a male, the anatomy is different, even though that's not an "in" channel for men either, I understand the physiology.
I don't know why anal sex would be an issue with lesbians, unlike gay men. Of course I'm no expert and some of this stuff I find downright perplexing. Oral/anal sex has me mystified. What could be the attraction? The old golden shower also has me baffled. Where's the pleasure?
Now if you'll excuse me, my dominatrix is waiting, and she's looking even more angry than usual.
I've noticed much vitriol directed at gay people for the last year or so, being somewhat ambivalent on the issue i havent given it much thought but now that it seems to be a political issue especially from the right i've been wondering why do people care whether some one is gay or not and why is it important politically?
To me whether some one is gay or not is about as relevant as whether some one has blonde hair or brown hair.
Did i miss the memo as to why this issue is important?
Your post could be dated today, a year ago, or even 10 years ago and it would still be as accurate and relevant as it is right now. Which is to say--no offense--not very.
There is no more or less Gay bashing going on right now than there has been in the past 20 years. If anything, gays are by and large more accepted and at least tolerated today than they have ever been. But, ironically, I would say that their militancy so fas as trying to lobby for more rights may be at an all-time high these days.
So basically I think you have things back asswards, amigo.
You've probably just recently been exposed to some good ol' fashioned Gay bashing rhetoric and or jingoism, but rest assured that said exposure on your part is in no way indicative of the current zeitgeist in this matter.
It's been observed in over 1500 animal species including lions, giraffes, penguins, and apes (our closest relatives).
Evolutionarily speaking, homosexuality encourages social bonding, population control, increased fertility in females, and provides extra caretakers for siblings' children.
By definition, something prevalent in nature is "natural". Computers, cars, twinkies, etc. are not natural. Homosexuality is.
Exactly! If it is so Natural why do lesbians have to use artificial means to have "natural" sex? Homosexual males have "unnatural" sex.
Um, more heterosexuals have anal and oral sex than gays, so flawed logic there anyway.
And who said those are "unnatural"? Just because it's not procreative doesn't make it unnatural. Are you really that clueless? Evolution does not work at the individual level. Only populations need to reproduce, not every individual within a population. Some members of a population not reproducing is a good thing, it's called population control.
Your completely ignorance over the fundamentals of biology, and your complete unwillingness to educate yourself make arguing with you completely pointless.
You'd much rather insult and attack gays, then pull your head out of the sand.
It's not about the homosexual. It's about the Gay Agenda. There's a difference, and Lefties know it, but they intentionally confuse the issue in order to make it seem like the real pushback is towards the gay individual. It's just another tool in the Leftist Toolbox to try to guilt people into accepting something that is not normal.
When process (specifically) did you go though and when that lead you to choose heterosuxuality?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
