Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-03-2012, 10:51 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by robbobobbo View Post
Babies aren't born with allegiances.
Yes, they are. I've already quoted the U.S. State Department on that.
Quote:
President Obama was born a US citizen.
He was also born a foreign citizen, with foreign allegiance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2012, 10:53 PM
 
Location: Metro-Detroit area
4,050 posts, read 3,960,239 times
Reputation: 2107
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
The only town drunk known to this poster is obama's illegal alien uncle who has grown a Lenin style beard since his drunk driving arrest.

Is this the town drunk?
Actually it's folk so deluded that they actually believe the CINC is not legal.
Actually it's idiots so afraid of their fall from the perch of privilege, that they are now trotting out the 14th Amendment.

Trust me, it's doesn't get more pathetic than that!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 10:53 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by reconmark View Post
Yeah Right...
Foreign allegiance occurs among all races. Why would you think it doesn't?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 10:56 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
or he could point at the decision in ankeny v. daniels.
No. State court decisions cannot supersede SCOTUS rulings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 10:56 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
2,953 posts, read 5,296,264 times
Reputation: 1731
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe View Post
Slinging "birther" comments does not work anymore.
Nah, still works pretty good for me. And for the majority of Americans, Right or left, that understand what really underlies your agenda.

It must really sting you guys to be sooooo marginalized by your own beliefs. I mean seriously, you have gained NO traction on this issue in the court system. So now you celebrate a technicality-a minor ruling against a dismissal that any mildly educated peron knows will not result in any significant result for your side. And here we sit, WE are laughing at you: Your stupidity, your intense desire to see a black man invalidated as the President of the United States, your unsuccessfully veiled racism. When this case crashes and burns, like they always do, you will provide even more entertainment for us by your crazy twisted conspiratory arguments as to why it didn't go the way you planned.

You people are like a court jester. Dance for us, you small minded little people. Dance!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 10:59 PM
 
Location: Metro-Detroit area
4,050 posts, read 3,960,239 times
Reputation: 2107
Quote:
Originally Posted by GWhopper View Post
Nah, still works pretty good for me. And for the majority of Americans, Right or left, that understand what really underlies your agenda.

It must really sting you guys to be sooooo marginalized by your own beliefs. I mean seriously, you have gained NO traction on this issue in the court system. So now you celebrate a technicality-a minor ruling against a dismissal that any mildly educated peron knows will not result in any significant result for your side. And here we sit, WE are laughing at you: Your stupidity, your intense desire to see a black man invalidated as the President of the United States, your unsuccessfully veiled racism. When this case crashes and burns, like they always do, you will provide even more entertainment for us by your crazy twisted conspiratory arguments as to why it didn't go the way you planned.

You people are like a court jester. Dance for us, you small minded little people. Dance!!!
Wait!!!...he hasn't entertained you with the 14th Amendment routine yet.

That one is hilarious in it's absurdity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 11:01 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by GWhopper View Post
Nah, still works pretty good for me. And for the majority of Americans, Right or left, that understand what really underlies your agenda.
Yep, the U.S. Constitution and the framers' established intention of specifically excluding foreign influence from our country's government's administration and military leadership. Of course everyone knows that. Or at least they should.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 11:06 PM
 
Location: Evergreen, Colorado
802 posts, read 564,177 times
Reputation: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yep, the U.S. Constitution and the framers' established intention of specifically excluding foreign influence from our country's government's administration and military leadership. Of course everyone knows that. Or at least they should.
And you would be correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 11:13 PM
 
Location: San Antonio
2,953 posts, read 5,296,264 times
Reputation: 1731
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yep, the U.S. Constitution and the framers' established intention of specifically excluding foreign influence from our country's government's administration and military leadership. Of course everyone knows that. Or at least they should.
What qualifies as "foreign" to you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2012, 11:18 PM
 
26,583 posts, read 14,449,955 times
Reputation: 7437
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No. State court decisions cannot supersede SCOTUS rulings.
correct, and yet none of the birthers attempted to appeal ankeny v daneils to the SCOTUS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top