Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW
Is the energy electromagnetic or acoustic? Most of the energy dissapated by an earthquake is a extremely low frequency acoustic as illustrated by the P (pressure) and S (shake) waves conducted by the crustal rocks. I still do not understand how electromagnetic radiation of whatever frequency can be used to trigger one set of rocks to slide along another converting megajoules of stress into measurable displacement.
|
The reason you cannot understand, is because they cannot do that.
Acoustically speaking...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9
Its called resonance frequency. Have you ever seen a singer shatter glass? Same concept except a much more powerful signal.
|
The singer did not shatter glass. It was crystal.
The reason it is called "crystal" is because of the particular
crystal lattice structure in which the atoms/molecules are arranged.
There's an episode of Sesame Street in which they sing, "
One of these things is not like the others...
Watch it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9
Oh ... so these multi-million dollar satellite systems can't monitor global temperatures?
|
Temperatures vary. The temperature (wind speed and wind direction) generally changes about every 2,000 ft to 5,000 ft (as does air pressure). The headquarters battery in DIVARTY provided us with that information. Field artillery needs it for targeting accuracy, since changing air pressure and wind speed, temperature (and thus air density) affect the characteristics of rounds in flight, plus we needed it for air operations and in the event a nuclear weapon is used, we need that data to plot cloud height and fallout.
There are many temperature inversions, with layers of warm air up to 10,000 feet think trapped between cold air layers (of differing temperatures) and also cold air layers trapped between layers of warmer air.
A satellite cannot "see" that. That's why we "send up the balloon." It is an helium filled weather balloon (hence the phrase: "When the balloon goes up...) that signals data every 2,000 feet until it reaches bursting height (and bursting height will vary based on temperature and pressure).
The point being if satellites were of any value, then we would have used them, instead of a weather balloon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9
What do we know:
A 9.0 magnitude earthquake occurred on March 11, 2011 at 05:46:23 UTC.
Low frequency signals were present before and after the quake as shown on the HAARP Induction Magnetometer (see below) in Gakona, AK. The image below was downloaded from the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) website. The fact that the data came from the HAARP system indicates the HAARP system was in use. That evidence is pretty good if you ask me. What do you have to show the signal was generated from the earth itself?
|
Um, that's 2.5 Hz. HAARP broadcasts in the 3 mHz to 30 mHz range.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9
The HAARP system is not a Shortwave radio or anything close to it.
|
It's a glorified Shortwave Radio.
What I'm hearing is that if there are two birds sitting in a tree, and it snows, then the reason it snowed is because there were two birds sitting in a tree.
Except sometimes it snows when there aren't two birds sitting in a tree.
No science here.
Resonating...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy
P.S. Has the fukushima radiation killed us all yet?
|
Yes, we're in Purgatory. Hadn't you noticed?
You'll know you're in Hell when you turn on the radio and every channel is playing Nixon's "Checkers speech" 24/7, and ever cable channel is broadcasting the home movie of David and Julie Eisenhower's wedding.
Glowing in the dark....
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by harborlady
If you'll bear with me, I think spatially in terms of barrels flashing and tracer rounds betraying the source position in linear ways. Much the same way a pool player can see elaborate geometry on a table. A fully fleshed out picture via satelite of the radio frequency originating from Alaska projected into the sky and landing on Japan would make sense, but 1 + 0 is not equaling 2.
The sat picture of Japan and your data of activity in Alaska above; why wouldn't the source show up in the same satelite image if whatever is represented in that picture were the identical RF/ material? Additionally, the epicenter of the quake triggering the tsunami happened in the ocean. If it were a deliberate attempt, why would they draw attention to themselves beaming on Japan directly when UL frequencies would go entirely undetected aimed at a strategic fault line underwater? Moreover how is it possible for a fixed grid designed to operate in strict lineal fashion able to defy physics and track onto targets of any kind? Once a cannon is cemented in, it can only do one azimuth. I'd need to see evidence of tracking equipment or satelite positioning that has the capacity to intercept and relay at will. There would be no other way to deliver it from Alaska to Japan. Impossible.
|
Very good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harborlady
I'm curious what effect specific UL frequencies would have on the containment systems for the nuke plant.
|
None. I'm not really up to speed on nuclear power plant design, but they were earthquake-proof. They were not, however, flood-proof, and that is why the containment system failed. The tsunami after the earthquake flooded the major systems not with water, but with salt-water from the sea, and that is when the problems started.
Bearing with you...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch
There is no science involved in this thread either, just moronic pseudo-science of the most inane kind. These twits cannot even comprehend that weather only occurs in the troposphere and stratosphere, yet HAARP operates in the ionosphere, which is over 40 miles above the stratosphere. Therefore, HAARP could not possibly have any effect on the weather or anything else.
|
I tried to explain that. I even quoted Major General Colt:
"Tell the ionosphere to get the hell of the radio!"
A lot of people were claiming Comet Elnin caused the Japanese earthquake (because the Earth is a big giant capacitor or some nonsense).
Weathering...
Mircea
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper
No, but according to this, ours is the world's largest. I'm beginning to think the Mayans were onto something.
|
The Mayans were not onto anything.
The Mayans did not event the calendar system. They merely inherited it from older cultures. That should be obvious by the fact that this is the 5th Age, or 5th Sun or 5th Calendar Round, because the first four calendar rounds predate the existence of the Mayans.
The point being the Mayans could not have invented something that was created before the Mayans existed.
It is true that a disaster coincided with the end of the previous four ages, but it is also true that those disasters were not predicted. It is also true that those disasters did not occur at that precise end of the calendar, rather they occurred in the years leading up to the end or in the years following the end (ie in the new calendar age). With the possible exception of "Water" which coincides with the Age of Leo, which is the date given by the Sumerians for the Deluge (and that would be between 10,000 BCE and 8,000 BCE), the other three disasters were local or regional, but not global. Those disasters were "Wind," "Quakes & Storms" and "Jaguar" (war/conflict). You should also know that some Meso-American cultures do not refer to them as such. For example "Wind" is referred to as the Age of White-haired Giants in some cultures, and White-bearded Giants in others, while "Quakes & Storms" is referred to as the Age of Red-haired Giants, or Red-bearded Giants.
If you notice, the calendar has the Frog Glyph (rebirth/birth) just as the other 4 calendars did.
The, um, "Mayan Elders" (snicker) would probably create a new calendar round, except they don't know how, because they are so disconnected from their ancestors that they wouldn't even know how to weave a basket like their forefathers did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper
I hear that we are having an increase in respiratory disease, asthma, COPD, emphyzema. I assume cancers will take longer to show up. We are consuming irradiated foods, and complying with low doses at every airport.
|
Hearing things is not the same thing as seeing data.
In any event, radiation would not be responsible for any diseases you mention.
If you want to read the effects of radiation, then read the study published by the Japanese Academy of Sciences on the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Then read that published by the US. Both studies came to the same conclusion that exposure to radiation does not pose the dangers that people have been misled to believe they would.
I've been doing dose reconstruction on my "Jesus crews" for about 15 years. Some of them received 30 rems to 60 rems whole body over a period of 18 months to 3 years. The only thing between us and the 4.5 kg to 18 kg of plutonium in those warheads was often nothing more than 5 mm of standard military grade aluminum, and then the PBX (which would have a density similar to concrete). But then how thick is an 8 ounce plastic explosive lens if it is covering a sphere that is is 5.5" in diameter?
Irradiated food is a non-issue. In fact, your food has always been irradiated, if by nothing else than natural background radiation. Your body gives off more radiation than most things. In fact, people are more dangerous than, um, "fallout" from the Fukishima reactors. You uptake radioactive carbon, oxygen, potassium and many other isotopes.
And going into your basement is 10x worse than being x-rayed at the airport. Radon gas is very dangers, not to mention you can inhale it.
Cancers are naturally occurring, and just as likely to be caused by natural background radiation or naturally occurring radiation. Read Ptolemy, ibn Ezra, Masha-allah, Zael, Bonatti, Valens, Rhetorius, Lily or any other astrologer/astronomer/doctor of medicine from the Ptolemaic Period through the Medieval Period and you will see them describe both lung and breast cancer in detail. And that was centuries before people started smoking. Note that Ptolemy is writing circa 234, Bonatti is writing circa 1084 and Lily in 1647.
In the Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Texts, you can read Sumerian and Akkadian texts that describe cutting open the patient, and scraping the bone to remove bone cancer. That was 5,000 years ago.
So, really, nothing new is going on, rather we are [ostensibly] better informed.
Onto nothing...
Mircea
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
