Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-02-2012, 11:34 AM
 
12,906 posts, read 15,666,651 times
Reputation: 9394

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kkaos2 View Post
Okay, you get HHS to add free viagra for men in there along with the free birth control for women, and then come back and make your arguments. Until then, it's apples and oranges.

A limited number of insurance policies voluntarily offer some coverage for Viagra for men, therefore all insurance policies should be mandated by the government to provide completely free birth control to women?

Sorry, that argument doesn't work.
That wasn't the argument I was trying to make.

The topic here is "recreational activities." My point was that sex by a female is not a recreational activity just as much as sex by a male is not a recreational activity. Insurance companies for Catholic organizations PROVIDE coverage for Viagra. It is not free-there is a copay. Insurance companies for Catholic organizations provide NO coverage for birth control.

The secondary discussion here is that the goverment mandated that not only do they have to now provide birth control coverage but that it must be free.

I'd be happy to get them to just provide the coverage. Period. Because being able to have sexual relations and enjoy sex with your partner without fear of pregnancy is healthy. Just like giving a man access to medication that allows him to achieve an erection so that he can have physical relationships--because it is healthy for him.

 
Old 03-02-2012, 11:37 AM
 
5,036 posts, read 5,139,768 times
Reputation: 2356
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
So with your logic if you break your leg skiing health insurance shouldn’t cover it? Get out of here!
Are you people really this dense?! Honestly. Since friggin when, was the possibility of getting pregnant a health issue? A sickness/disease? I realize that some of you think the result of pregnancy can sometimes be worth killing, depending on how you feel at the time, but thats a different issue. PREGNANCY IS NOT AN ILLNESS. The act of sex can result in a BABY. We all know this!

Now take some damn personal responsibility or at least for God's sake quit expecting everyone else to pay for it. You want to have sex, PAY FOR IT!!! Youre comparing sex to an injury?!
 
Old 03-02-2012, 12:03 PM
Status: "Content" (set 2 days ago)
 
9,008 posts, read 13,846,004 times
Reputation: 9668
Default Why is it ok to cover Viagra but not BC?

What's the difference?
Why is it ok for Health insurance to cover one but not the other,conservatives?
 
Old 03-02-2012, 12:05 PM
 
12,906 posts, read 15,666,651 times
Reputation: 9394
Good question.

And let's be clear too (as on another thread), this is not about FREE birth control. This is about providing coverage AT ALL.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 12:06 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243
One is a health issue and the other is a recreational issue.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 12:07 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243
Also, so you know, most insurance policies will only cover like 4 Viagra pills a month.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,830,565 times
Reputation: 12341
A better question to ask would be... why should the employer decide on how I use the benefits or my income?
 
Old 03-02-2012, 12:08 PM
 
12,906 posts, read 15,666,651 times
Reputation: 9394
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
One is a health issue and the other is a recreational issue.

Please elaborate. That's what this is about. How is one a health issue and how is one a recreational issue?
 
Old 03-02-2012, 12:09 PM
 
5,524 posts, read 9,941,585 times
Reputation: 1867
It all boils down to religion and Viagra is not a Contraceptive which is "banned" by the church. They are also two different things.

Viagra vs. Birth Control is also not a Man vs. Woman thing. Men can buy condoms. That's their contraceptive. Woman use BC pills. Viagara isn't banned by religion so it's not even on table.
 
Old 03-02-2012, 12:09 PM
 
Location: The Beautiful Pocono Mountains
5,450 posts, read 8,765,333 times
Reputation: 3002
Health issue? That's debate able.
Covering Viagra by the taxpayers is not ok.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top