Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Or simply buy their own da*m box of condoms if they're partners are too stupid to do so. Seems pretty simple, doesn't it? The usual entitlement mentality...I want, I want, I want...just so long as someone else pays.
the Pill is not just about prevent pregnancy. Women who are not sexually active may take the Pill for other reasons, from issues w/ acne to timing of your period.
What a relief it was to find that your link ws to a 2007 article and not one written to support the Obamas about forcing Catholics and then insurance companies when the Catholics failed to back down to hand out this kind of thing for women.
I heard the Obama woman, Kathleen Sebelius talking to a congressional committee and she outright told the questioner that what they were looking to do was hold down population growth and this method would actually save money. I get to thinking that these people really do want to have less normal growth of population and they have thrown that into the discussion. Why do they want that so bad?
What if a woman wants to **** her husband without getting pregnant? Or do you think that the only reason anyone, male or female, married or single, should have sex is to get pregnant?
It's two different things. This whole thing started with a religious argument that contraceptives are banned by the church. The only argument is about the religious aspect. Not Male vs. Female.
The church believes that no one should use contraception to prevent a pregnancy. A man who is unable to get hard would take Viagra in order to have sex to get his wife pregnant so the church sees no problem with it. The whole thing is about religion and a women not being allowed to prevent pregnancies. Are men allowed to get vasectomies? If yes then you have an argument. If not then VIAGRA IS NOT AN ARGUMENT.
This is coming from someone who thinks it should be covered but from a medical perspective not a "so I can bang who ever I want" perspective.
You are an angry little girl I see. Women can still have sex without BC pills. Viagra is NOT a contraceptive, condoms are for men. That's the equivalent to women's BC pills. Don't get all twisted over an apples to oranges comparison. Women can have all the sex they want, but when they are irresponsible or to horny and can't say no when their partner doesn't have a condom, dig deep into your pockets when you want that abortion baby!
Yep. You answered any question I may have had about you being a decent human being. I am glad you're okay with our country returning to 1950, but I promise you, I will fight this right wing BS until my dying breath.
That is blatant discrimination against women. A man receives coverage for his serious physical ailments but a woman does not. Bring on the Taliban!
Exactly. This is beyond frightening to me. We are going back to the dark ages instead of progressing. jesus.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
