Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-03-2012, 02:02 PM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,830,864 times
Reputation: 8442

Advertisements

Here we go again. I honestly don't see how the Mods of this part of CD continuously let the same topics come up every couple weeks. But here we go....

Quote:
Originally Posted by ButterBrownBiscuit View Post
It depends upon what you consider an "absent" father. As the link below notes, not being married to or co-habitating with the mother, does not automatically mean that black men are absent from their children's lives.

~ButterBrownBiscuit~


The Myth of the Missing Black Father
In regards to the OP, please see post above that everyone seemed to have ignored.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big George View Post
I wish people like you could see beyond your own racism, and were able to actually discuss this serious problem.

The fact is, over 70% of black babies born in America today, are born to single mothers. This is a VERY serious problem, and for many reasons.

Maybe - just maybe - we could stop talking about it as a "black problem" and start talking about it for what it is: A very SERIOUS problem.

72% of black babies born to unwed moms; data revive debate - Houston Chronicle
In response to above, please see quoted post above this one. Unwed mother births do not equal "fatherless" children. My mom and dad weren't married and I knew my dad my whole life and am the ultimate "daddy's girl" as are my two sisters. My two brothers also had and have a very good relationship with our father, who though he had issues, took care of his children and was always there for us and never abandoned us. Honestly, I don't know many black people at all who's father completely abandoned them. Unfortunately the one I do know is my own husband and ironically he and his dad had a very close relationship since my husband was in his 20s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tim6624 View Post
Although I feel that, ultimately, the choice to abandon a child is up to the mother/father, the main reason why single parent households have exploded in recent years is GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION.

Before LBJ's "Great Society" programs were instituted, despite "racism", "segregation", and "oppression", 9 out of 10 Black men were in the house helping their spouse raise their children. Once the government guaranteed that you don't need a man to survive, that number is now less than 4 out of 10. White culture is headed down the same downward spiral.
On the bolded above, the 90% of black men being married and helping spouses raise their children prior to the 1960s is vastly incorrect. (Source). In 1964 25% of black children were born to unwed mothers and it was near 30% by 1968.

From the source regarding welfare being the reason for increase in out of wedlock births:

Quote:
One argument that appeals to conservatives is that of Charles Murray, who attributes the increase to overly generous federal welfare benefits. But as David Ellwood and Lawrence Summers have shown, welfare benefits could not have played a major role in the rise of out-of-wedlock births because benefits rose sharply in the 1960s and then fell in the 1970s and 1980s, when out-of-wedlock births rose most. A study by Robert Moffitt in 1992 also found that welfare benefits can account for only a small fraction of the rise in the out-of-wedlock birth ratio.
Bolds were added by me.

Black people in this country have always had a higher incidence of having unwed mothers give birth to children. This is one area the only one that I feel has a basis in both slavery (where women were sytematically bred and raped and marriage was not recognized, hence it was not seen as important since the beginning of black history in this country).

Also the reason why there are few marriages IMO and which the above source from Pew Research alludes to is the fact that the women's liberation movement freed women from forced marriages just because they were pregnant. "Shotgun marriages" fell out of favor and after that occurred unwed mother rates rose in all demographics, including black women. FWIW, my paternal grandparents were married via a shotgun style type of arrangement. That was in the early 50s.

Also the rate of black children being born to unwed mothers has slowed dramatically in recent years (Source).

From the source:

Quote:
The share of births that are non-marital is highest for black women (72%), followed by Hispanics (53%), whites (29%) and Asians (17%), but the increase over the past two decades has been greatest for whites—the share rose 69%.
Black women went from having an unwed birth percentage of 67% to 72%, which was much less than other groups and equal to that of Asians between 1990 and 2008.

Regardless though, just because a father is not married to the mother of his child does not mean he has abandoned that child. Like the quote by ButterBrownBiscuit (sounds really tasty I must say) indicates, many black men see and participate in their children's lives on a regular basis and they are not abandoned by any means.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-03-2012, 02:04 PM
 
723 posts, read 2,194,160 times
Reputation: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYer75 View Post
We are addressing blacks and the affects of losing grants will have on them. If we see the numbers low now, cutting grants to those who want to attend college is NOT going to help.
My mistake. I thought you were arguing for a decrease in aid monies. Excuse the above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Allendale MI
2,523 posts, read 2,204,503 times
Reputation: 698
Well if anyone cares the black community didn't have these problems before the 60s. If you compare the hippie movement to urban culture today. You will see alot of similarities.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 02:55 PM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,411,358 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michigantown View Post
Well if anyone cares the black community didn't have these problems before the 60s. If you compare the hippie movement to urban culture today. You will see alot of similarities.
Before the '60s the black community had the problems of crosses being burned in their front yard, voting, lynchings, Jim Crow laws, etc., etc. Did you say you missed American history classes when you were in school, or did you go to school prior to the '60s and the truth was not taught?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 03:09 PM
 
1,300 posts, read 1,493,752 times
Reputation: 441
I couldn't rep your post, but you get a thumbs up!!!

~ButterBrownBiscuit~


Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
Before the '60s the black community had the problems of crosses being burned in their front yard, voting, lynchings, Jim Crow laws, etc., etc. Did you say you missed American history classes when you were in school, or did you go to school prior to the '60s and the truth was not taught?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 03:14 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
2,239 posts, read 3,231,184 times
Reputation: 1180
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
Before the '60s the black community had the problems of crosses being burned in their front yard, voting, lynchings, Jim Crow laws, etc., etc. Did you say you missed American history classes when you were in school, or did you go to school prior to the '60s and the truth was not taught?
People on here tend to delete certain parts of American history as they see fit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 03:30 PM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,830,864 times
Reputation: 8442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michigantown View Post
Well if anyone cares the black community didn't have these problems before the 60s. If you compare the hippie movement to urban culture today. You will see alot of similarities.
Please see my post above. These problems existed before the 60s as well. In 1960 itself 24% of black children were born to unwed mothers. Which was nearly 10 times the rate of unwed white mothers. Also slavery made a lot of illegitimate black babies prior to the 1950s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 03:36 PM
 
Location: SoCal/PHX/HHI
4,142 posts, read 2,840,911 times
Reputation: 2889


Jeebus, what is that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 03:39 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,221,200 times
Reputation: 18824
The causes for absentee black fathers are the same as with any other race: dysfunction.

It's a dumb question. I guess that its ok if you wanted to open up yet ONE MORE thread about blacks. But dysfunction is dysfunction....you can't assign a race to it. That's just common sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2012, 03:44 PM
 
2,729 posts, read 5,373,305 times
Reputation: 1785
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshim View Post
I think it's deeper than just the marriage issue itself. First we have to address why people are no longer interested in the institution of marriage, let alone with the person that they chose to procreate with in the first place.

Heck, maybe take a step further and discuss how people are even getting together and concieving children to begin with...I mean I think we all know how...but perhaps it's time to address just under what circumstances and environments are these decisions being made from the jump.

I don't think the idea of men simply marrying the mother of their children, simply for the sake of statistics is going to help anything. Black folks already have the highest divorce rate...shot gun weddings would just simply elevate that number, plus incidents DV would probably just go up for both genders. And marrying and sticking out for the "sake of the children" never works either.
Good points.

What I don't understand is how & why - in this era where contraceptives are everywhere - people don't seem to take precautions to NOT get pregnant. My wife & I had the exact number of kids we wanted to have, and it wasn't for lack of sex. It's because we took the necessary precautions, and it has been well worth it.


When all the dust has settled, and all the race-baiting is seen through, I think it comes down to personal responsibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top