Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2012, 06:32 PM
 
Location: Illinois
2,430 posts, read 2,768,805 times
Reputation: 336

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
This is going to explode some brains. I am not surprised that historians are already placing Obama among the ten best. Considering what he has accomplished against unbelievable obstruction and bias is going to give him an impressive legacy.
.Soon we will find , out of those who voted for him last time will vote for him again. Thats not knowable, yet. And if he is reelected only about half will be happy............If they are happy in 20 years I say he was a good President, all we know now is he is the first African President. But Bill Clinton claimed that too. That's a Debate I would watch

Last edited by bluescityleon; 09-26-2012 at 06:34 PM.. Reason: sp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2012, 06:44 PM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,170,612 times
Reputation: 28335
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluescityleon View Post
.....all we know now is he is the first African President. But Bill Clinton claimed that too. That's a Debate I would watch
What Obama has done is be born with a dark complexion and break what many thought was a iron barrier, but that does not automatically make him a great or even good president. Bill Clinton did more to uplift the black community during his presidency than Obama has if you don't count the barrier breaking. You only need to be elected once to achieve that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 06:45 PM
 
3,709 posts, read 4,629,899 times
Reputation: 1671
Newsweek, as usual, is full of crap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 06:47 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,229,680 times
Reputation: 6553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Best president because of their ancestry.. that is a new one.. Weird.
That is what it said in the caption when you click on Obama's pic
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Dallas
490 posts, read 650,644 times
Reputation: 251
I get tired of people who don't see why Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. It was because the World saw his election as a sign of hope that America was finally ready to put its racial issues behind and move forward. It was not a result of any great thing Obama did as much as what he represented in American history and it should be recognized as a great moment in time. I'm black and I can say that since I was a child I was told that being President would not happen in my lifetime. I think of my grandparents who did not live to see that moment and I recall the stories they told me of their youth. They had a hard time believing we put a man on the moon and they certainly never thought America would elect a black President. So when I heard Obama won Peace Prize I saw it as America winning it. I wish others would too and we could live up to the meaning of it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,229,680 times
Reputation: 6553
Quote:
Originally Posted by cecilsav View Post
I get tired of people who don't see why Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. It was because the World saw his election as a sign of hope that America was finally ready to put its racial issues behind and move forward. It was not a result of any great thing Obama did as much as what he represented in American history and it should be recognized as a great moment in time. I'm black and I can say that since I was a child I was told that being President would not happen in my lifetime. I think of my grandparents who did not live to see that moment and I recall the stories they told me of their youth. They had a hard time believing we put a man on the moon and they certainly never thought America would elect a black President. So when I heard Obama won Peace Prize I saw it as America winning it. I wish others would too and we could live up to the meaning of it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
In which case The United States of America should have won the prize. I know there are some out there who believe everyone deserves a trophy regardless of performance, but paaaalease. Now he is nominated as a top 10 president??????? We really do need to raise the benchmark a tad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 07:06 PM
 
488 posts, read 412,982 times
Reputation: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by cecilsav View Post
I get tired of people who don't see why Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. It was because the World saw his election as a sign of hope that America was finally ready to put its racial issues behind and move forward. It was not a result of any great thing Obama did as much as what he represented in American history and it should be recognized as a great moment in time. I'm black and I can say that since I was a child I was told that being President would not happen in my lifetime. I think of my grandparents who did not live to see that moment and I recall the stories they told me of their youth. They had a hard time believing we put a man on the moon and they certainly never thought America would elect a black President. So when I heard Obama won Peace Prize I saw it as America winning it. I wish others would too and we could live up to the meaning of it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Symbolism is worthless when (rewarded?) awarded to a paper tiger who accomplished nothing to merit the esteem. But that sort of tokenism seems appropriately sensible to people who feel righteous about something yet can't be bothered to actually do something about it, like racism, and so go along with nonsense. But then, Obama was seemingly not Bush, at least visibly, and the Scandinavians do have this fashionable thing going on about embracing 'diversity' rather than actually getting to know and accepting people who aren't like them.

Also, the Nobels have hit hard times with their investments and have recently had to reduce the monetary amount of their resume'-building proclamations, so maybe fundraising had something to do with their (ig)noble gesture?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Dallas
490 posts, read 650,644 times
Reputation: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
In which case The United States of America should have won the prize. I know there are some out there who believe everyone deserves a trophy regardless of performance, but paaaalease. Now he is nominated as a top 10 president??????? We really do need to raise the benchmark a tad.
My post was only referring to several references to the Nobel Peace Prize. I think only history can decide the Top Ten thing.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 07:08 PM
 
Location: On the border of off the grid
3,179 posts, read 3,167,475 times
Reputation: 863
Newsweek is a rag that was sold in a fire sale for $1. Remember the cover "We're All Socialists Now!" ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Dallas
490 posts, read 650,644 times
Reputation: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEternalSanctuaryMan View Post
Symbolism is worthless when (rewarded?) awarded to a paper tiger who accomplished nothing to merit the esteem. But that sort of tokenism seems appropriately sensible to people who feel righteous about something yet can't be bothered to actually do something about it, like racism, and so go along with nonsense. But then, Obama was seemingly not Bush, at least visibly, and the Scandinavians do have this fashionable thing going on about embracing 'diversity' rather than actually getting to know and accepting people who aren't like them.

Also, the Nobels have hit hard times with their investments and have recently had to reduce the monetary amount of their resume'-building proclamations, so maybe fundraising had something to do with their (ig)noble gesture?
I don't understand how you can say he did nothing? He ran for President of The United States and the majority of his fellow Americans felt him worthy for the office. Only a few people have positioned themselves in life to achieve that. Have you?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top