Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I hate this argument. It's not about power. It's about women, understandably, wanting to be able to enjoy the finer things in life and not have to worry about where the money for the next bill will come from and it's about men who, understandably, want to experience the joy that comes with having a beautiful mate. I wish we could get to a point where we wouldn't have to impugn the characters of men and women when they place high premiums on these things.
Some women need to learn whats not "THEIRS", they need to stay away from. Neither women should have went after the General in the first place.........he was wrong, but any woman who would pursue a "MARRIED" man is not much of a woman......
Call these women what you want, as we can see high education doesn't always give a person class.........
So now floozies = whores.
Yes, we get it, all women are whores.
Doesn't this crap grow tired for you, OP?
Your mother, sister(s), wife, daughters, etc. are all floozies and whores?
Do you ever think your posts through?
I'd say any woman willing to fool around with a married man is probably both.......Petraeus is to blame also, but women with any class don't touch another woman's man.......get your/their own......
Perhaps they can sense that these egomaniacs can't keep their dicks in their pants. Who says no to free dinners and nights on the town?
Calling them floozies while leaving these turds in suits alone does what for your moral compass by the way?
When it comes to an affair or sex, it is ALWAYS the woman's fault. Women have the last say when it comes to sex unless they are raped and that is a crime.
Its part of nature and survival of the species. The weak will always try to gravitate to the socially understood strong in order to survive. This allows progress in that the strong can be brought down by the weak in order for the social to replace the supposed strong.
For example.
A General is supposed to be smart. He is supposed to thoroughly understand the human condition and modes for behavior emerging out of the individual. If a General needs to send 100,000 pages of letters to a women, never mind a married women for whatever objective, he is off the wall in any strategic advantage in his whole comprehensions in the understandings of what life is, whatsoever. This way the insecure women or gang of women have well done their duty within the species, in clearly defining a weakness far too inefficient to be in the front leading the flock. The women who is attracted to the socially held strong in a decided way, is demonstrating a weakness for social acceptance, and choosing for acceptance out of the social instead of acceptance, toward mutual harmony, toward unity as a chief objective, The objective toward harmony allows a contribution to the world by showing not only perseverance but very importantly example for the race 's known quest for flourish, out of an indication of undisturbed inner peace not without focus, and a clear healthy ego for it.
Last edited by stargazzer; 11-14-2012 at 07:19 AM..
In case you didn't notice, this is a forum for exchanging ideas and bringing about debate. There's nothing that suggests that I need or even should cover every single topic in this scandal in a single thread. If you're so consumed by the lack of berating of Patraeus in this particular thread, then why don't you start your own?
Seriously. Are you intentionally trying to be obtuse and deflective? You folks need to get a grip and start thinking deeper instead of with the emotional grandstanding that comes with the liberal mindset.
Whoa Nelly there!
We're merely doing the same thing as you when we bring another trivial observation to threads like this one.
Holy moly; this thread exemplifies the very epitome of mindless drivel. Berating those of us who added another consideration to it as needing to think deeper and being of typical liberal mindset is really going off on a tangent.
I'm thinking the typical liberal mindset would be one that would apportion guilt to only one party in a typical, silly, mundane, all too common, tryst.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
