Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:03 AM
 
1,637 posts, read 1,881,944 times
Reputation: 1240

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by zentropa View Post
I reported this thread ages ago but the mods must think such language is appropriate to describe women. OK.


The OP wasnt describing all women this way, just the golddigging attention seekers. Why so sensitive?

 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:04 AM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,425,834 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by stargazzer View Post
If a babe can pull you away from an active promised and intimate commitment, then how can money and exposure from the "enemy" not pull you away from your active promissed commitment, to the country..?

answer that and continue tipping your hat to the leading spy of a Nation, and I will be impressed with learning something new today.

I propose with the evidence in this thread and all other the lefties could be overthrown by Neanderthals with one hand tied behind their back.
Because thinking with the head below is DIFFERENT than thinking with the one on your neck. Some soldiers, federal employees, DOD cheat. They don't sell classified information. In fact my former brother in law is a serial cheater and has access to highly sensitive information no one accuses him of selling classified information, Again you have no reason to put that out there without evidence. There were officers in my unit that cheated while their commanders covered it up, but they never once accused them of selling military info. Those are two separate psychological and moral issues. While cheating is not illegal in the civilian world, selling classified information is. Both are illegal in the military.
 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:09 AM
 
151 posts, read 183,264 times
Reputation: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Singlelady10 View Post
Because thinking with the head below is DIFFERENT than thinking with the one on your neck. Some soldiers, federal employees, DOD cheat. They don't sell classified information. In fact my former brother in law is a serial cheater and has access to highly sensitive information no one accuses him of selling classified information, Again you have no reason to put that out there without evidence. There were officers in my unit that cheated while their commanders covered it up, but they never once accused them of selling military info. Those are two separate psychological and moral issues. While cheating is not illegal in the civilian world, selling classified information is. Both are illegal in the military.
You're wrong it shows a lack of control. Your brother in law should count his blessing because that behavior can be used against him if somebody ever needs to get rid of him. Lack of control is a psychological issue. You think with your head always, do us a favor and take an anatomy class please.
 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:12 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,316,377 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by bongo
Harem Of Floozies?!
worthless whores?!
Floozie Class!?

Choice of words speaks volumes about the OP, rather than these two women. Pretty sad volumes indeed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by smittyjohnny38 View Post
Typical liberal. Words mean more to you than actions.
Words have meaning. Are you saying that people should just ignore the degrading words the OP used to describe Broadwell? If we're to just judge the actions then we need to remember that TWO people who were married to other people had an affair together and the words used to describe those action/the affair need to apply equally to both of them.
 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:16 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,497,191 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Singlelady10 View Post
Because thinking with the head below is DIFFERENT than thinking with the one on your neck. Some soldiers, federal employees, DOD cheat. They don't sell classified information. In fact my former brother in law is a serial cheater and has access to highly sensitive information no one accuses him of selling classified information, Again you have no reason to put that out there without evidence. There were officers in my unit that cheated while their commanders covered it up, but they never once accused them of selling military info. Those are two separate psychological and moral issues. While cheating is not illegal in the civilian world, selling classified information is. Both are illegal in the military.
The problem is the attendant stimulous for a bad choice to be made.

Let's say your BIL is married to a lawyer who knows her rights. Let's say he has an affair while married to her and the person demands he cough up some secrets lest she expose his affair to his wife who is perfectly placed to take half his earnings, half his pension, half his taxable benefits, maybe all of the home and other assets as there might be a couple of children of school age still present in the household.

Oooopsy; your BIL is now confronted with a choice to sell out his country or go into the black hole of eternal penury due to a stupid decision. Is he of the moral fibre that would enable him to come clean and take the hit. Answer in one word ~ NOPE! He's already demonstrated his moral compass is skewed and that is the risk no organization valuing it's secrecy will ever knowingly place in the hands of an adulterer, ex-con, avowed gossiper or evangelical nubar for examples.
 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:17 AM
 
1,637 posts, read 1,881,944 times
Reputation: 1240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Words have meaning. Are you saying that people should just ignore the degrading words the OP used to describe Broadwell? If we're to just judge the actions then we need to remember that TWO people who were married to other people had an affair together and the words used to describe those action/the affair need to apply equally to both of them.

How would you describe Broadwell? The OP wasnt being politically correct. You seem like a classy lady, so Im going to ask you to be intellectually honest and in your own words please describe how you would assess Broadwell.
 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:17 AM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,980,917 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
Words have meaning. Are you saying that people should just ignore the degrading words the OP used to describe Broadwell? If we're to just judge the actions then we need to remember that TWO people who were married to other people had an affair together and the words used to describe those action need to apply equally to both of them.
Considering that Broadwell is married, "floozie" is a perfectly accurate description for her based on the definitions below.

Is it a derogatory description? Yes, but still accurate based on the acts that she chose to embark on

Does it somehow imply that Petraeus did nothing wrong at all? Not at all, whatever gender equivalent term for "floozie" that can be applied to a man can and should be applied to him based on the same logic.

Whats the problem here?

floozie - definition of floozie by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
n. pl. floo·zies Slang
A woman regarded as tawdry or sexually promiscuous.

promiscuous - definition of promiscuous by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
pro·mis·cu·ous (pr-msky-s)
adj.
1. Having casual sexual relations frequently with different partners; indiscriminate in the choice of sexual partners.
2. Lacking standards of selection; indiscriminate.
3. Casual; random.
4. Consisting of diverse, unrelated parts or individuals; confused: "Throngs promiscuous strew the level green" (Alexander Pope).
 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:19 AM
 
1,637 posts, read 1,881,944 times
Reputation: 1240
Quote:
Originally Posted by t206 View Post
Considering that Broadwell is married, "floozie" is a perfectly accurate description for her based on the definitions below.

Is it a derogatory description? Yes, but still accurate based on the acts that she chose to embark on

Does it somehow imply that Petraeus did nothing wrong at all? Not at all, whatever gender equivalent term for "floozie" that can be applied to a man can and should be applied to him based on the same logic.

Whats the problem here?

floozie - definition of floozie by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
n. pl. floo·zies Slang
A woman regarded as tawdry or sexually promiscuous.

promiscuous - definition of promiscuous by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
pro·mis·cu·ous (pr-msky-s)
adj.
1. Having casual sexual relations frequently with different partners; indiscriminate in the choice of sexual partners.
2. Lacking standards of selection; indiscriminate.
3. Casual; random.
4. Consisting of diverse, unrelated parts or individuals; confused: "Throngs promiscuous strew the level green" (Alexander Pope).



I really miss the days of being able to call a spade a spade in this country. Hopefully America will be like that again one day
 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:19 AM
 
3,763 posts, read 8,754,604 times
Reputation: 4064
Quote:
Originally Posted by smittyjohnny38 View Post
Typical liberal. Words mean more to you than actions.
Bull- show me any proof up to this date that Jill Kelley has taken any inappropriate actions that warrant any of these words.
 
Old 11-14-2012, 09:22 AM
 
8,411 posts, read 7,425,834 times
Reputation: 6409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Where is W? View Post
You're wrong it shows a lack of control. Your brother in law should count his blessing because that behavior can be used against him if somebody ever needs to get rid of him. Lack of control is a psychological issue. You think with your head always, do us a favor and take an anatomy class please.
Most of our politicians have a lack of control. Again, it can not and will not be proven that because military or federal employees cheat that they sell out the intelligence of country. I took a Psychological and Sociology class thank you. Do me a favor and take a military history and psychology class. Better yet talk to military members that have top secret clearances and cheat, they will tell you the same thing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top