Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't understand why liberals think their pet projections should be exempt from tax. They want to tax fast food products to deter behavior, I say we tax their abortions.
What about republican abortions? Should we tax those?
I just love the hypocritical liberal agenda sometimes. (note: I find the same hypocrisy for a conservative agenda, too)
Everyone has a right to free healthcare, to education, foodstamps, government housing, equal wages, marriage, and on and on and on. Yet, an unborn baby does not have a right to life.
She's killing a human being. You didn't see John Wayne Gacy protected behind a right-to-privacy cloak, now did ya?
I know the comparison seems absurd, but these "couples" are procreating, they are making another human being; an abortion should come with some level of consequence.
Again, the majority of my stance on this issue pertains to those who wait to get their abortions. Late term abortions are, by definition, murder.
john wayne gacy has nothing to do with abortion, stay on topic. abortion does have consequence, and the woman who has one deals with it herself. again, get educated about late term abortions. women don't just change their minds at 8 months along, call any abortion clinic and have an abortion because swimsuit season is around the corner. late term abortions are done only for medical reasons. you need two doctors to sign off on them and only about 1% of abortions are late term, which amounts to about 1,000 a year
Totally constitutional since anything, including inaction, can be taxed now. I say we go for it. We're always taxing things to deter behavior in our society, this is no different.
It's as constitutional as making it cost $10,000 to vote.
And I would like all women to get free birth control pills, that would be an even exchange IMO.
I agree. I think contraception should be as readily available as the air we breath. You would still have your lazy welfare bums that are too lazy to take them, though.
To answer: yes only the rich could afford abortions.
To answer the other question: We want to deter abortions for the same reason liberals want to deter what I put into my body with regulations and taxes.
To answer: yes only the rich could afford abortions.
To answer the other question: We want to deter abortions for the same reason liberals want to deter what I put into my body with regulations and taxes.
you want access to abortions for the rich only and not the poor? sex education and easy access to birth control are what deters abortions. your random talking points about what "liberals" want, are off topic and strawman positions
Totally constitutional since anything, including inaction, can be taxed now. I say we go for it. We're always taxing things to deter behavior in our society, this is no different.
That's insance - 10,000% tax. No more than 9,999% + FEES is as far as I would go. With a 50 years to life, prison sentance thrown in for infanticide
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
