Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,116,202 times
Reputation: 4270

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
You haven't shown how worker's rights are declining.
Part of worker's rights are their employers adopting certain safety standards. A company that disregards safety standards is violating workers' rights. And seeing how the mining industry used to be heavily unionized and isn't anymore, and the result of that lack of unions is a major profitable company like Massey being allowed to repeatedly ignore warnings about their safety standards, that counts as declining worker rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:06 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,041,959 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Part of worker's rights are their employers adopting certain safety standards. A company that disregards safety standards is violating workers' rights. And seeing how the mining industry used to be heavily unionized and isn't anymore, and the result of that lack of unions is a major profitable company like Massey being allowed to repeatedly ignore warnings about their safety standards, that counts as declining worker rights.
Any real safety standard is a law, union or not union the employer still has to follow the laws. If they aren't following the laws that has nothing to do with a labor union, that has to do with the gov. not enforcing the laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:13 PM
 
59,106 posts, read 27,340,319 times
Reputation: 14286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Grass Fever View Post
I tell you why people don't like unions, especially right-wing types! It gave minorities and women power! That's it in a nutshell!
Why aren't you complaining about the WHITE head of the union.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,116,202 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
Any real safety standard is a law, union or not union the employer still has to follow the laws. If they aren't following the laws that has nothing to do with a labor union, that has to do with the gov. not enforcing the laws.
So the safety violations that Massey repeatedly violated would have been allowed to stand if a union had been in place? And before you go into "well we don't know what the union would have done" remember that multiple employees and managers voiced their concern over this and were threatened w/ firings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:20 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,154,196 times
Reputation: 12921
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
Part of worker's rights are their employers adopting certain safety standards. A company that disregards safety standards is violating workers' rights. And seeing how the mining industry used to be heavily unionized and isn't anymore, and the result of that lack of unions is a major profitable company like Massey being allowed to repeatedly ignore warnings about their safety standards, that counts as declining worker rights.
Are you suggesting that the government, knowingly, is allowing Massey to repeatedly ignore warnings and refusing to take action? If that's the case, isn't that a problem with the government and not the lack of unions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:20 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,041,959 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieB.Good View Post
So the safety violations that Massey repeatedly violated would have been allowed to stand if a union had been in place? And before you go into "well we don't know what the union would have done" remember that multiple employees and managers voiced their concern over this and were threatened w/ firings.
Are the safety regulations that you claim they violated current state or federal laws? Are we talking about OSHA or something environmental in nature?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:22 PM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,041,959 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Are you suggesting that the government, knowingly, is allowing Massey to repeatedly ignore warnings and refusing to take action? If that's the case, isn't that a problem with the government and not the lack of unions?
Exactly, if it's illegal it's illegal with or without a labor union. OSHA doesn't GAF if a business is union or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,116,202 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Are you suggesting that the government, knowingly, is allowing Massey to repeatedly ignore warnings and refusing to take action? If that's the case, isn't that a problem with the government and not the lack of unions?
It's doesn't matter why the gov't failed to force Massey to clean up its act. You said that unions don't have a place in modern times. Would a union have allowed Massey to force workers to choose between safety and a job?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:25 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
9,701 posts, read 5,116,202 times
Reputation: 4270
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
Are the safety regulations that you claim they violated current state or federal laws? Are we talking about OSHA or something environmental in nature?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
Exactly, if it's illegal it's illegal with or without a labor union. OSHA doesn't GAF if a business is union or not.
Irrelevant, irrelevant, irrelevant. The mines violated safety standards, were repeatedly fined, and had it brought to their attention by workers and managers. Would a union have allowed the company to force workers to choose between working in dangerous conditions or be fired?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Thumb of Michigan
4,494 posts, read 7,483,911 times
Reputation: 2541
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
Any real safety standard is a law, union or not union the employer still has to follow the laws. If they aren't following the laws that has nothing to do with a labor union, that has to do with the gov. not enforcing the laws.
Somebody hasn't moved out of their parent's basement yet....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top