Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Um, yes, it is. To say "Winning the Nobel Peace Prize and giving a *lecture are not evidence that someone was officially nominated" sounds pretty insane to me too.
*the lecture you were referring to was the Noble Peace Prize winner's lecture
You seem to be very selective in what nominations you consider valid, and your decisions appear to be politically driven.
Politically driven? How in God's name did you come up with that? The only circumstances under which I believe somebody has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize are: 1) when that person is announced as winner 2) when a qualified nominator makes a public statement indicating the person he or she nominated.
Obama (whom* you brought up, not me) qualifies under category 1). "Dr." Jim Garrow does not fit either description. And I'm especially keen on dismissing his claim based on the absurd story behind it and the fact he's a lying, fraudulent, con-man.
I don't know what this is supposed to mean, but I will say that when the president gives the order to fire on American citizens, a foxhole in a defensive position will be rather useful, the deeper the better.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.