Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:34 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
You are basically asking why we need Coast Guard, Border Patrol, ICE etc other law enforcement agencies, and it amazes me that people have to ask why we need them.
Yeah why? The M-16 or M-4 that special forces use isn't good enough? Wake up!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:37 PM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,477,416 times
Reputation: 9440
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Yeah why? The M-16 or M-4 that special forces use isn't good enough? Wake up!!!!!
My guess would be that he`s awake and SANE!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:42 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Thanks. It isn't the clearest sentence I've ever read, but that's what it says. It certainly doesn't seem to be placing a concealment specification requirement on the rifle. I mean, there are pages describing the specification requirements for the rifle - wouldn't it make more sense to include that requirement there rather than in this sentence about usage.
I don't buy that. There are better ways to word what you are trying to say. A 30 inch 7lb. weapon is for concealment as in hiding it. You can fire ANY rifle from a sniper position. Actual sniper rifles are way longer than 30 inches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Yeah why? The M-16 or M-4 that special forces use isn't good enough? Wake up!!!!!
From what I have read, that's what they are ordering.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:44 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
My guess would be that he`s awake and SANE!!!
Go back to sleep Mr. Magoo. None of your useless answers are acceptable. Why do they need a 30 inch Personal Defense Weapon? Who are they defending against? Is China about to invade us or something?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:44 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990
I would say, let the feds have these 10" bbl AR-type rifles if they wish. The .223 round is small caliber and uses a small bullet. Most of its effectiveness comes from its high velocity, but every inch of barrel that you lose 50-100 fps of velocity:
BBTI - Ballistics by the Inch :: .223 Rifle Results

The short barrel AR phenom is mostly a thing of fashion, IMO. People seem to think that the tiny rifles somehow look cool. I suppose there is merit to the 'honey badger' concept if you want a suppressor, but otherwise no.
From a 14.5 inch barrel (M4) the velocity is already well under 2000 fps at 200 yards, and would not penetrate some vests. Last I heard, the US Marines opted to keep their 20" barrels while everyone else was switching over to the M4. Let the feds have their 10" barrels. I'll be answering w/ my 22" barrel M1A in .308 if they try to haul me off to FEMA (lol). Note carefully the lol means the statement is intended as mostly tongue in check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
I don't buy that. There are better ways to word what you are trying to say. A 30 inch 7lb. weapon is for concealment as in hiding it. You can fire ANY rifle from a sniper position. Actual sniper rifles are way longer than 30 inches.
They are looking for something they can use in both situations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:45 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
From what I have read, that's what they are ordering.
No, they want a new rifle built. Read the specs. You aren't getting an M-16 or M-4 at 7lbs. and 30 total inches in length with the stock extended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Go back to sleep Mr. Magoo. None of your useless answers are acceptable. Why do they need a 30 inch Personal Defense Weapon? Who are they defending against? Is China about to invade us or something?
At the borders they might need them against armed drug runners for example
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 12:46 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,459,609 times
Reputation: 4243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
They are looking for something they can use in both situations.
ok, why the need for concealment then? Concealment from who and personal defense from who? The Chinese? AQ? Illegal immigrants? Who?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top