Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2013, 06:52 PM
 
24,415 posts, read 23,070,474 times
Reputation: 15020

Advertisements

Why do they need 1.2 BILLION hollow point pistol rounds? They ordered that last year. Why are they paranoid of returning military vets? Janet Napolitano considered them potential terrorists. Why does Obama want to spy on americans like Bush 43 did only in an even greater capacity? They took the right to free elections from us, now they want to ban our right to bear arms. Now they want to flood us with illegals some of whom are crminals. We're in the crosshairs, people, all of us.
Oh well, at least they haven't shut down the internet yet and we can still have free sp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2013, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Coast Guard gets their weapons from DoD.
They are considered a military branch even in peacetime with special privileges for operating on US shores.
DHS took them over from the Dept of Transportation (peacetime mission), not the Dept of the Navy.
They are under DHS . Link please showing the source of their weapons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 07:00 PM
 
19,023 posts, read 25,969,090 times
Reputation: 7365
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
This concerns me. This got my tinfoil hat tightened up pretty good. There is absolutely NO reason at all to conceal an assault rifle unless you are trying to surprise people with it. The ONLY people this can be done to are Americans.
I asked you yesterday for any info on the new class of gun type, and have lost the thread ....

Also if i recall the feds bought a large amount of ammo and shipped it to strange places like islands off maine, but that was a while ago... There were going to arm weather stations with it too. I can't recall, but it seems with in reason normal at the time but sort of larger...

It does take a lot of ammo for training, so i am not really saying a whole lot unless these are connected.

I don't KNOW anything on this topic and am just curious.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 07:01 PM
 
45,227 posts, read 26,450,499 times
Reputation: 24985
The bigger question is why do we need the DHS?

Last edited by Frank DeForrest; 01-29-2013 at 07:10 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990
7000 is a lot, considering that this is a very specialized gun, basically a concealed-carry rifle (20" or less in collapsed/folded form).

Less than 100 years ago when the FBI was created, Congress was very leery about armed federal police. At first the FBI was forbidden from carrying guns; they were supposed to get help from local police if guns were required. Now we are at the point where 7000 concealable rifles is considered "not that many."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 07:59 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,744,889 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Why arm the Law Enforcement like Border Patron and Coast Guard? So they can perfom their duties, and provide for homeland security.

It's amazing people have to ask.
"homeland security"... now that's really funny.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
They are under DHS . Link please showing the source of their weapons.
The USCG is a unique branch of the military.
Under peacetime they reported to the Dept of Transportation.
Under wartime the Dept of the Navy.

I was USCG for 8 years and no one really understands how they operate.

DHS took them over from the Dept of Transportation which is their peacetime mission.
The Dept of Transportation did not provide their weapons nor their vessels, the DoD (Navy) did.
They use standard military issue non-lethal weapons while conducting peacetime missions.

United States Coast Guard - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Coast Guard is a maritime, military, multi-mission service unique among the U.S. military branches for having a maritime law enforcement mission (with jurisdiction in both domestic and international waters) and a federal regulatory agency mission as part of its mission set. It operates under the Department of Homeland Security during peacetime, and can be transferred to the Department of the Navy by the President at any time, or by Congress during time of war.


The DHS doesn't order cutters for the USCG do they ? DoT didn't do that; USCG got their cutters through the Navy.

With the USCG being a military branch, it's just logical that they have the same choice of weapons as other military branches because in times of war the USCG has augmented the military overseas (like in Vietnam). To arm them with a "personal defense weapon" like an AR is just plain stupid if you think about it. USCG keeps their munitions locked up and you get issued arms if you are on patrol or standing guard.


Logic should tell you that no military branch should have these personnel AK weapons.
Maybe Border Patrol or ICE.

Purpose - U.S. Department of Defense Non-Lethal Weapons Program
U.S. Coast Guard Non-Lethal Weapons Information - U.S. Department of Defense Non-Lethal Weapons Program

DoD Weapons Procurement 2013 (USCG is there under Navy for cutters and weapons).

http://www.finance.hq.navy.mil/FMB/13pres/WPN_BOOK.PDF

also look up OPNAV INSTRUCTION 4000.798 which was put in place to keep the USCG up to par with the Navy.
So unless Janet is ordering guns for the Navy the Coast Guard won't get them.

Last edited by HappyTexan; 01-29-2013 at 08:28 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 08:21 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
7000 is a lot, considering that this is a very specialized gun, basically a concealed-carry rifle (20" or less in collapsed/folded form).

Less than 100 years ago when the FBI was created, Congress was very leery about armed federal police. At first the FBI was forbidden from carrying guns; they were supposed to get help from local police if guns were required. Now we are at the point where 7000 concealable rifles is considered "not that many."
7K is a lot but who are they arming ?

Border Patrol, ICE, USCG all have their own procurement/training processes and directives.

DHS is really the administrative arm they fall under for orders.

Maybe those TSA gropers are going to get them at the airports ? LOL.."Put down that cup of coffee or I'll blow your head off"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,419,987 times
Reputation: 4190
They should have ordered a crate of Barrett .50's and some good optics and declared open season on the trespassers at the border. The drug dealers would think twice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2013, 08:45 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,371,062 times
Reputation: 23858
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
I'm asking this question because it seems either nobody wants to answer it or they can't. Think about this for a minute. DHS put out a new contract for bid to build a new, lightweight, easily concealable assault rifle. Why? The ONLY reason for concealing an assault rifle is for the element of surprise. Who do they plan on surprising? You're not going into a foreign country with an assault rifle under your jacket to wage war, you aren't protecting anything with a concealed weapon, you would want that out in the open as a show of force. The only reason? To use the element of surprise on American citizens.

https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&m...=core&_cview=0
I can see how a paranoid would think this way.
I can also see why DHS would have the need for a small lightweight rifle. DHS agents are required to move around and confront many unknowns.
Shrinking the size and the weight of the kit is why the assault rifle was designed in the first place, as soldiers have exactly the same needs.

Any small weapon is more easily concealed. Concealment may not be the primary purpose that the DHS needs in it's weaponry. The two do not go hand in hand automatically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top