Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-21-2013, 04:51 PM
 
26,580 posts, read 14,524,710 times
Reputation: 7450

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
.... which requires, born on US soil, to TWO citizen parents.
wrong again claud.

ankeny v daniels :

"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are "natural born Citizens" for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."

and a huge list of historic references that all contradict your belief:

Natural Born Citizenship Research: BOOKS ON GOOGLE BOOKS THAT DEFINE "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2013, 06:12 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,444,159 times
Reputation: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
wrong again claud.

ankeny v daniels :

"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are "natural born Citizens" for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."

and a huge list of historic references that all contradict your belief:

Natural Born Citizenship Research: BOOKS ON GOOGLE BOOKS THAT DEFINE "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"
Ankeny was a flawed decision. Besides you posted dicta from a appeals state case The case never discussed presidential eligibility nor did it specifically declare Obama a natural born Citizen. Here is what matters. The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”. Both Obama's and Cruz's fathers were not U.S. citizens at their birth. They are ineligible along with Bobby Jindal and Marco Rubio and possibly Governor Nikki Haley (I don't know when her parents naturalized).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 06:16 PM
 
26,580 posts, read 14,524,710 times
Reputation: 7450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
Ankeny was a flawed decision.
that decision has been concurred with a dozen times in other court decisions. you know that, oh ye whose previous names may not be spoken.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 06:18 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,127,717 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
Ankeny was a flawed decision.
Ankeny is the law of the land, and has been cited as precedential in almost a dozen subsequent cases.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier
The case never discussed presidential eligibility nor did it specifically declare Obama a natural born Citizen.
Are you crazy? What "or Article II, Section 1 purposes" are there other than presidential eligibility?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier
Here is what matters. The Supreme Court of the United States has never applied the term “natural born citizen” to any other category than “those born in the country of parents who are citizens thereof”.
This is, of course, a bald faced lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 06:21 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,614,426 times
Reputation: 6324
Who cares? Cruz has as much chance of becoming president as I do becoming King of Zamunda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 06:24 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,444,159 times
Reputation: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Ankeny is the law of the land, and has been cited as precedential in almost a dozen subsequent cases.


Are you crazy? What "or Article II, Section 1 purposes" are there other than presidential eligibility?


This is, of course, a bald faced lie.
Here you go. Everybody read and learn what a true natural born Citizen is:


The meaning of the term-of-art ‘natural born citizen’ has been addressed, and confirmed by the US Supreme Court. The idea that all persons who are a citizen at birth, are ‘natural born citizens’ can not possibly be accepted for the simple reason that NO part of the Constitution can be interpreted in such a way as to make any part of the Constitution irrelevant. What that means is that the Constitution MUST be interpreted in such a way that every word in relevant. The idea that ‘citizen at birth’ equates to ‘natural born citizen’ ignores the word ‘natural’. If the intention was otherwise, they would have simply said a ‘born citizen’, or a ‘citizen at birth’ or ‘born a citizen’. So it is clear they intended something else. So - what does the word ‘natural’ mean in the context of ‘natural born citizen’? There are two types of law. There is ‘positive law’ - this is man-made law, such as the Constitution, laws from Congress, state law, local ordinances, and so on. And then there is ‘natural law’ - this is the law of nature, or the divine.

An example would be when the founders wrote the Declaration of Independence, and stated - “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”. That is a form of natural law. So, the term ‘natural born citizen’ means EXACTLY what it says, a citizen at birth according to natural law. OK - what is a citizen by natural law? Remember, a natural law is one that is unwritten. So a citizen by natural law, would be a citizen that would require no man made ‘positive’ law to be a citizen. So, when is someone a citizen without need of any positive law? When they can be nothing else. Does that sound familiar? Ever heard someone answer a question with the word ‘naturally’, because the answer could be nothing else? “Does Monday come after Sunday? Naturally!”.

Who can be nothing other than a citizen at birth, and therefore requires no positive law? There are 4 basic variables governing citizenship. 1) born in or out of a country. 2) Both parents are citizens. 3) One parent is a citizen. 4) Neither parent is a citizen. The first (where born) is combined with the other 3 to determine whether or not a child is a citizen at birth. There are laws written to govern every situation - except one. The only situation not covered by positive law is when a child is born in a country, and both parents are citizens of that country. Why? Because no law is required, the child is a citizen ‘naturally’, therefore the child is a natural born Citizen. Remember, a statutory citizen (bestowed by man's pen) can never be a "natural born" citizen (bestowed by God/nature).

Last edited by Old Army Soldier; 03-21-2013 at 07:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 06:36 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,290,935 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
Here you go. Everybody read and learn what a true natural born Citizen is:
You have the gall to post a comment from an ABC article about Ted Cruz and act like its a fact?

And that you don't even attribute that you copied and pasted this from the article without

1) the person's permission (unless you are MMCain)

2) and where you stole it from.

You have shown to be dishonest and stretch the truth, but this really takes the cake:

The content I snipped came from the comment section of this article by an ANONYMOUS poster:

Senator Ted Cruz and 7 Other Birther Conspiracy Theories - ABC News


And let me repeat, THIS IS FROM THE COMMENT SECTION OF A NEWS ARTICLE ON A NEWS WEBSITE. This is NOT from any recognized legal website, nor is it offered by ANYONE who is experienced in citizenship laws of the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,127,717 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
And let me repeat, THIS IS FROM THE COMMENT SECTION OF A NEWS ARTICLE ON A NEWS WEBSITE. This is NOT from any recognized legal website, nor is it offered by ANYONE who is experienced in citizenship laws of the US.
And it's complete gobbledygook as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 07:19 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,444,159 times
Reputation: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
You have the gall to post a comment from an ABC article about Ted Cruz and act like its a fact?
.
That's because it IS fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 07:22 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,444,159 times
Reputation: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
nor is it offered by ANYONE who is experienced in citizenship laws of the US.
Who are you to determine who is experienced in citizenship laws of the U.S.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top