Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No less then my own senator from the Golden State of California, Dianne Feinstein(D) rejected the most qualified female member of the CIA personnel for the head Clandestine Operations post.
Wow, that just really makes you look silly, taking one instance of a politically-charged appointment decision (that has nothing to do with it being a woman) and making it look like liberals are attacking all women. How does that even remotely sound smart to you? Ridiculous.
Never mind that you said nothing of this sort when Obama Admin pushed for two women in the Supreme Court and the first woman to chair the Federal Reserve.
Meanwhile, conservatives like Phyllis Schlafly are the ones expressing concern about the idea of women earning equal pay for the same work output as men (the horror!) because it might interfere with conservatives' hopes and dreams imposed upon these women to be good dutiful married arm candy, housekeepers, meal cookers, and baby poppers. And what did we see in that thread: every conservative speaking up about how women and men need to "know their places."
Conservatives have such a stone age view of gender roles and relationships that they are positively clueless when it comes to anything about women's rights.
A Democrat denied an important job to the most qualified woman.
That constitutes a Democrat war on women.
If Democrats want to turn around their war on women, thy have about just under 7 months to do so before women go to the polls and vote for the GOP instead of the donkey party(the namesake of which is ironically a female animal).
Give it up dude. I'm not in denial. I don't play the rationalization game. All the projection on this forum is done by right-wingers. The only one you're fooling is yourself. Go argue with your bathroom mirror; I have better things to do.
Wow, that just really makes you look silly, taking one instance of a politically-charged appointment decision (that has nothing to do with it being a woman) and making it look like liberals are attacking all women. How does that even remotely sound smart to you? Ridiculous.
Liberals do similar things all the time, making sweeping generalizations about Republicans, and yet you buy it hook, line, and sinker.
You are if you don't understand the Democrats have a serious bridge to gap with women if they want that segment of the voting population to punch "D" in November.
Ah, so you agree that abortion is the innocent destruction of human life.
That is progress(and Dems are supposed to be progressive, right?)
Using your alcoholic model from above, the first step to solve a problem is to acknowledge that you have one.
Keep it up.
Stating the date of a SC decision is equivalent to agreeing with that decision? Only a deluded mind could make such a connection. I've never given an opinion on Roe v Wade, and it doesn't matter, because only the opinion of the Court counts. Didn't you pass civics class?
(Innocent destruction? Your rattled nerves are showing. Watch out! Black helicopter.)
Liberals do similar things all the time, making sweeping generalizations about Republicans, and yet you buy it hook, line, and sinker.
How does that even sound remotely smart to you?
Ridiculous.
So you are trying to argue against things you have heard that you think are stupid by... saying stupid things? Let me know how that works out for you.
At any rate, for the record: liberals make the "war on women" point when conservatives trip over themselves to make stupid 1950s generalizations about women in threads like this:
Wow. You don't even get it. Have a good day. I can't go on without violating the TOS.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
