Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Considering that human females (usually) produce only one egg each month, you'd be going hungry.
Our eggs would have to be much bigger and I would hate to pass an egg big enough to contain a human fetus every month. Ouch!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn
I doubt you'd find a young woman with enough patience to sit on her eggs.
We would have to have pre-hatch programs or there wouldn't be enough kids to fill the pre-K programs. Them liberals love their programs - especially the ones for the children.
No kidding. Can you imagine protecting that egg for 9 months. Im sure there would be lots of "miscarriages".
Well, this thread got silly when people started to talk about marsupials. Let us face facts: kangeroos and the other marsupials do not lay eggs. Even if they did, I doubt they would be tasty.
Now, the platypus does lay eggs: two to four at a time. The following chart will tell you everything you need to know about the playful platypus:
Notice that the platypus is surprisingly large: much larger than the gorilla. I was surprised at that. I was not surprised to see that the chicken is smaller, or the snake, although I have seen some very, very big snakes.
Anyway, the real point of this thread should be: anytime you have a creature, like a platypus, that is larger than a gorilla, yet also has a poisonous spur (which the gorilla lacks), then one should be concerned.
It is said that the platypus can eat its own weight every day, which, from the picture, equates to two gorillas per day. Where the platypus has access to that many gorillas, especially in Australia, I do not confess to know.
It is like Groucho Marx once said: This morning I shot a platypus in my pajamas. What the platypus was doing in my pajamas, I don't know.
I mean, would you as easily destroy the egg at 20 weeks or so?
Good Lord. I get slapped around by a mod for starting a thread saying Capital One commercials discriminate against my Norwegian heritage and then by PM get called a troll, but somehow this intellectual oatmeal is OK? There ain't no justice I tell ya.
Good Lord. I get slapped around by a mod for starting a thread saying Capital One commercials discriminate against my Norwegian heritage and then by PM get called a troll, but somehow this intellectual oatmeal is OK? There ain't no justice I tell ya.
Intellectual gooey oatmeal is good for those of us who are too physically ill to understand any of what they read except I understand intellectual gooey oatmeal at the moment.......
Under the TMI banner....I have not eaten eggs since I was about 4 years old and learned that
"angel food" ( scrambled eggs) was an unborn chicken. That most other people eat and enjoy eggs does not bother me. Guess I was pro-choice from the start.
I mean, would you as easily destroy the egg at 20 weeks or so?
You may want to limit the question to RWNJs... they seem to be very familiar with "laying eggs".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
