If we humans laid eggs, would you feel differently about abortion?

[tonylu]

Originally Posted by alphamale

I mean, would you as easily destroy the egg at 20 weeks or so?

We probably wouldn't need to think about abortion at all. We'd do what sea turtles do and leave the eggs in the nest so the children that hatch would fend for themselves. However, there might be issues between egg abandonment and non-egg abandonment. The non-egg abandonment supporters might see it as child neglect. Egg abandonment supporters might think of it as a way for one group to suppress the other's freedoms.

Weirdest question I've ever encountered. Egg laying humans would solve a lot of problems though. Might cause a lot more.

[irishvanguard]

Remarkably, liberals interested in seeing how thoroughly successful their conditioning and programming has been should simply re-read their posts in this thread. They have all become perfect "clockwork oranges", without exception.

[MustangEater82]

Depends on how the omlettes tasted.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

[monemi]

Originally Posted by alphamale

I mean, would you as easily destroy the egg at 20 weeks or so?

I'd feel differently. It's not wholly reliant on one single human being to put their life on hold to carry it to term. If science could ever transfer pregnancies to another willing party, I wouldn't be pro-choice. As it stands, only the person who conceived can carry a pregnancy to term.