Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:02 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,889,770 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post



Not much use for an ongoing investigation I would think.
I would think that in an ongoing investigation, the government would actually have a phone number whose activity they wanted to track. They wouldn't need the information about my phone. In an ONGOING investigation. But it the government only wants data on their citizens, without going through the appropriate and lawful channels to obtain that data, then having a dummy court sign TOP SECRET warrants is the way to go. I would think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:03 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,060,237 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
And the purpose for keeping the warrants secret, TOP SECRET, is to keep the breadth and depth of the data mining secret from the American people.
So on a practical level does the government go about picking which Americans they would like to know how they conduct surveillance and those that they are trying to surveille?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:04 PM
 
Location: North Texas
24,561 posts, read 40,296,127 times
Reputation: 28564
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Look at this! Reps think they should be excluded from the monitoring.... We officially have Tyranny folks!


Watch Eric Holder Refuse to Answer Whether Congress’ Phones Were Monitored | Video | TheBlaze.com




BTW, I think it's funny that they are also being monitored and mad about it although Holder won't say so....
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." George Orwell, Animal Farm, 1945.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I've given up hope that the corruption can be fixed.
So have I.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:05 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,299,061 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
More Democrats in DC voted FOR expanding the powers of the PA than ever before. Go ahead and believe what you want.
BTW, Biden says he drafted the bill in 1995 after Oklahoma City.
A person can claim whatever, but the Patriot Act as a matter of reality involved a lot of people and agencies that is just objective reality.

Again, most of the Opposition of the Patriot Act has been the Democratic party. The majority of Democratic voters have never supported the Patriot Act.

The opposite facts are true of conservatives. I know it sucks, but it is the truth. Liberals were opposed to the Patriot Act and conservatives were wildly supportive. Liberals were saying giving the government this kind of power will lead to spying on Americans, and conservatives said they didn't care as long as we got the terrorists and won the war on terror.

I know it sucks to now see the results of the terrible policies that conservatives support, but reality is there for anyone to see. Go look at polling data on who supports the Patriot Act.
Go look at congressional voting records to see who voted for the Patriot Act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:06 PM
 
Location: bold new city of the south
5,821 posts, read 5,305,558 times
Reputation: 7118
Default US government secretly collecting phone records of millions of Americans

This is the transparency in government Obama was talking about.

Unbelievable- US government secretly collecting phone records of millions of Americans-paul-imagescaejuhyl.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:07 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,889,770 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
So on a practical level does the government go about picking which Americans they would like to know how they conduct surveillance and those that they are trying to surveille?
On a practical level, the government gets information about a potential terrorist, and investigates that potential terrorist. There is nothing practical about declaring that all of Verizon's customers are potential terrorists, and therefore every one of their phone calls is of potential interest to the government, so therefore the government should compel a phone company to, on a daily basis, provide the government with the records of every phone call placed on the phone company's network.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by florida.bob View Post
Well, this "scandal" seems to have run it's course..... What's up next?
Why would you think this was a scandal ?
It was all legal and above board..they did go to a judge to get the records on all verizon subscribers.
So 1/3 of all Americans need to be monitored until the middle of July in order to keep the country safe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:08 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,954,445 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73
There were/are many liberals and many liberal organizations that were/are against the Patriot Act. Ron Paul wasn't nearly close to being the only one.

He was a rarity amongst conservatives, who love the surveillance state and whose voters by overwhelming majorities supported the Patriot Act, but that is not the case for a lot of Democrats and liberals who have been against the Patriot Act since day one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Not since Obama expanded it.
Oh really?

Cindy Sheehan did:
The USA MATRIOT ACT | MichaelMoore.com

and Michael Moore did the first time around.
Michael Moore | The Patriot Act
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
On a practical level, the government gets information about a potential terrorist, and investigates that potential terrorist. There is nothing practical about declaring that all of Verizon's customers are potential terrorists, and therefore every one of their phone calls is of potential interest to the government, so therefore the government should compel a phone company to, on a daily basis, provide the government with the records of every phone call placed on the phone company's network.
Verizon reported 121 million subscribers as of April so that's 1/3 of all Americans who are potential terrorists.

The government's War on Terror has turned on its own people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 01:12 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,060,237 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
I would think that in an ongoing investigation, the government would actually have a phone number whose activity they wanted to track.
What I learned along time ago while covering drug enforcement operations is that what we civilians think is how an operation is suppose to go and how they work in real life are three different things. Does that mean that I would love to understand the details of how this data mining works, you bet I would. Is it in the interest of the government for me to know... that is a whole other story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top