Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:07 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,457,656 times
Reputation: 4243

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
It is nice to make claims without a single thread of factual data.

What is the POWERBALL NUMBER FOR NEXT WEEK?

What is really funny is all the people who are in such an uproar, then go to sites like Facebook, twitter, etc. and put all sorts of "private" info out for the world to see.
Let's see the data that phone numbers were used to find the Bombers. We ALL know that isn't true. There were many photos of them and they were identified. How do you identify someone from a phone number if they weren't collecting names and call content? It's quite impossible, especially when there were thousands of people in that same are using cell phones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by KickAssArmyChick View Post
LOL and you believe "they" aka the same people spying on millions of Americans? Ha ha ha.

Yes because "they" are telling the truth. Uh huh.
Well that got all that info re-classified as "metadata" rather than transmission data.
No reason they couldn't get the actual conversations labeled as well and then exempt from needing warrants.

Tell me that dialing a phone number is NOT transmission data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
8,227 posts, read 11,149,703 times
Reputation: 8198
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamme73 View Post
first, i am not a democrat. .
lmao!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:10 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,889,770 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
That's great, but conservatives do support the Patriot Act. You get that right. That conservatives cheerleaded the expansion of the surveillance state under GWB, and that Democrats remain, the only group with substantial members who were and are against the surveillance state.

As nation we need to understand where conservative ideology will lead us and these kinds of crappy policies conservatism supports.

Again, conservative supported the disastrous war in Iraq, conservatives supported torture, conservatives supported GITMO, supported not giving terrorists trials and just holding them indefinitely, conservatives supported the Patriot Act, conservatives supported the expansion of the surveillance state.

This cannot be repeated enough.

conservatives supported these terrible policies.
I don't care if they once supported these terrible policies. I care that they don't support them now. It was bad policy crafted from bad positions. It's going to take bipartisanship to get rid of the Patriot Act. This court order could be helpful to achieve that end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Let's see the data that phone numbers were used to find the Bombers. We ALL know that isn't true. There were many photos of them and they were identified. How do you identify someone from a phone number if they weren't collecting names and call content? It's quite impossible, especially when there were thousands of people in that same are using cell phones.
Especially since the court order runs from 4/25-7/19 and the bombing happened 4/15.
And they asked for 121,000,000 records..33% of Americans were suspect in the Boston bombing 10 days after it happened ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:13 PM
 
Location: North Texas
24,561 posts, read 40,296,127 times
Reputation: 28564
And another discussion about the US government violating the civil liberties of its citizens devolves into page after page of partisan finger-pointing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:14 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,299,061 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Who cares what voters thought, it's what YOUR REPS thought that YOU VOTED FOR and MANY DEMS that the Left voted for support this.
It matters what the voters thought, Democratic voters did punish some Democrats for supporting the war on Terror, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, Joe Libermann they faced consequences for the Iraqi war, President Obama was mostly the nominee because he opposed the war in Iraq.

But most importantly it shows where ideology leads us, when Democrats say they are for freedom, there is a real track record there of them being the only major political party that opposes the expansion of military power and the surveillance state which to me is the real threat to American freedom.

conservative ideology supports the surveillance state supports the expansion of the military. I know that sucks for conservatives but reality is reality. They supported torture, supported the Patriot Act, supported GITMO, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDGeek View Post
And another discussion about the US government violating the civil liberties of its citizens devolves into page after page of partisan finger-pointing.
So true. And things will only get worse seeing they got away with it and a judge ok'd it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,509,263 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
It matters what the voters thought, Democratic voters did punish some Democrats for supporting the war on Terror, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, Joe Libermann they faced consequences for the Iraqi war, President Obama was mostly the nominee because he opposed the war in Iraq.

But most importantly it shows where ideology leads us, when Democrats say they are for freedom, there is a real track record there of them being the only major political party that opposes the expansion of military power and the surveillance state which to me is the real threat to American freedom.

conservative ideology supports the surveillance state supports the expansion of the military. I know that sucks for conservatives but reality is reality. They supported torture, supported the Patriot Act, supported GITMO, etc.
Go and view the track record of Pelosi. Maybe that will wake you up.
And then go view Harry Reid's record.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-06-2013, 02:19 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,299,061 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDGeek View Post
And another discussion about the US government violating the civil liberties of its citizens devolves into page after page of partisan finger-pointing.
It is not partisan. conservatives supported these things. If you don't like these policies then understand that when conservatives are elected these are the kinds of policies they support.

Certainly some Democrats support this stuff, but there are a lot of Democrats who don't. This is important.

If you don't like the Patriot Act, then doesn't it behoove us to understand the ideology that pushed for it, that supported it, that keeps supporting it.

If you don't like torture, isn't it important to understand the ideology that did support torture?

If you hate the Iraq war isn't it important to understand the ideology that did support the war.

If you hate the expansion of the surveillance state isn't important to understand the ideology that supports it?

How can we correct these things if we don't get rid of the political actors who are most likely to support these crap policies.

That's not partisan that is reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top