Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sterilization for women is major surgery.
There is a limited chance of reversal depending on the method used.
There are also associated costs for surgery, etc.
I know, I had myself sterilized.
How about you start with getting yourself sterilized, against your will, since that's what you want to inflict on others.
How about corporate welfare that takes much more of our GDP?
No need to respond.
Wow! SMH!
You "think" you know
Now, let me school you some.
I AM sterilized and I wanted it done after my first child because I had a high risk pregnancy and the dumbassed doctors told me I was too young and I might change my mind. I was 22. I got pregnant again at 25 while using 2 different methods of BC. I had a lot of complications with that pregnancy but thankfully my son was healthy, tho' I almost died both times. My second child I was on Medicaid because I couldn't work due to the pregnancy being high risk
Major surgery, really? They went through my belly button *shrug* it was hardly "major". I had zero complications.
Depending on how it's done, it's completely reversible.
There's no "against anybody's will" They would have choices...somehow, you're not getting that point, or more like ignoring it.
Single mothers that can't pay the bills must have welfare cut after the first birth, any more kids then no extra cash - and if they can't pay then the kids must be put into an orphanage
I think that is the way to go, right?
So, let me get this right. If the mom can't pay the bills with welfare, the kid should be taken, and the state should pick up the tab ? WTF ! What kind of logic is that ? Just let the mom keep her kids and collect welfare.
Have I misunderstood this post ? After-all I have had a couple glasses of wine.
So, let me get this right. If the mom can't pay the bills with welfare, the kid should be taken, and the state should pick up the tab ? WTF ! What kind of logic is that ? Just let the mom keep her kids and collect welfare.
Have I misunderstood this post ? After-all I have had a couple glasses of wine.
Mother can get welfare for 1 or 2 children, then no more for any extra kids.
Nothing wrong with that, because with this policy the numbers will reduce.
Ummm....yeah....just as natural as it is for women to have children.
Men should be held equally responsible when it comes to caring for their children.
Men don't have the choice, women do.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
