Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They are listening to the spin of the defense. The actual testimony of witnesses that contradict Mr. Zimmerman are going to be labeled irrelevant.
I don't know if Mr. Zimmerman will be convicted. Maybe his defense is working. Maybe the state won't prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt to the jurors, but Mr. Zimmerman's story doesn't add up witness accounts are contradicting his story as well as his location as well as some of the physical evidence, that doesn't mean he is guilty, but it does point to him not telling the truth about the events that occurred. If one is objective that has to be troubling that maybe he did kill Mr. Martin and is attempting to cover it up with lies and misdirections.
The witnesses are doing themselves in. The first one called yesterday changed her story completely from what she said in her original statement. The next few were all assuming things and got things completely wrong or saw something on the news that made them see things a certain way. None of them are credible.
It's not in the record of THIS trial at this point, and it won't be in the record of THIS trial if the Defense does not call him as a hostile witness. NOTHING is on the record in THIS trial right now other than what the witnesses have testified to and the physical exhibits which have been entered into evidence, and the bench conferences with the Judge, plus attorney objections and motions, and, of course, the Court's rulings.
It's not in the record of THIS trial at this point, and it won't be in the record of THIS trial if the Defense does not call him as a hostile witness. NOTHING is on the record in THIS trial right now other than what the witnesses have testified to and the physical exhibits which have been entered into evidence, and the bench conferences with the Judge, plus attorney objections and motions, and, of course, the Court's rulings.
Man you would suck as a lawyer. Whatever he says now will be compared to his statements then. Sheesh, I'd hate for you to be my lawyer in a damn parking ticket.
It's not in the record of THIS trial at this point, and it won't be in the record of THIS trial if the Defense does not call him as a hostile witness. NOTHING is on the record in THIS trial right now other than what the witnesses have testified to and the physical exhibits which have been entered into evidence, and the bench conferences with the Judge, plus attorney objections and motions, and, of course, the Court's rulings.
I've become addicted to your posts, please continue.
Man you would suck as a lawyer. Whatever he says now will be compared to his statements then. Sheesh, I'd hate for you to be my lawyer in a damn parking ticket.
Why on earth would you think of hiring me as a lawyer? I'm not a lawyer.
Btw, what has Mr. Martin said on the witness stand in this trial at this point??? I don't believe he has said a word. And UNTIL he is called as a witness and takes the witness stand, nothing he has said is "on the record" in THIS trial, which means there's nothing for the jury to consider. If no one calls the father as a witness, there will be no record in THIS trial of anything he has said. I really don't know how to explain this concept more simply. Sorry if you're not getting it.
I don't think the dad's alleged denial is on tape. Serino put it in one of his reports. Mr. Martin's statement contends that Serino is wrong.
There may possibly be "a" record somewhere, or some documentation somewhere, of what the father allegedly said, but you know that that "record" has nothing to do with this trial UNLESS the Defense calls the father as a witness and asks him questions about who was screaming, there is NO RECORD IN THIS TRIAL of any statement by the father and therefore nothing for the jury to consider. Again, I don't think it would be great strategy to harass the father on the witness stand; juries tend to react negatively to beating up on family members of victims.
"the person that was on top was the person that got up". Interesting.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I've become addicted to your posts, please continue.
I'm not a lawyer. 