Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That could be possible, not sure about probable though. If I were the prosecuting attorney I would show that he took a CCL class, had a CCL, the curriculum for the class, and any other supporting evidence. In and of itself, knowledge (or lack thereof) of SYG doesn't mean anything unless and until GZ takes the stand. Knowledge of SYG would just go towards credibility since he said he hadn't heard of SYG before.
They could indeed help damage his credibility with that. However, I question if it's enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that all of Zimmerman's statements are false. Primarily, it's hard to refute John Good's testimony. That testimony flat out helped Zimmerman's case.
You know, the more you people brush off how the much the prosecution has helped the Defense, the more I suspect you as hacks. A policeman lies to Zimmerman saying there is possible evidence in audio/video form and when he responds "thank God..." you come out and say he knew with out a doubt they had nothing basically?
And the police believed Zimmerman, but luckily for you that has been stricken from the record. Hopefully, it will stay in the jurors minds though.
I didn't come out with it, the Prosecutor did today when questioning the Lead Investigator.
And, like it or not policeman use tactics to get a person to give up information...The Prosecutor referred to it as "You bluffed Zimmerman"
Yet another reason for the college information. One of the courses taken by George last year I believe...was about Criminal litigation....The Prosecutor is trying to show that Zimmerman has more understanding of how this type situation, investigation could play out......It all will become clear....watch the trial.
Last edited by JanND; 07-02-2013 at 06:38 PM..
Reason: edit text
They could indeed help damage his credibility with that. However, I question if it's enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that all of Zimmerman's statements are false. Primarily, it's hard to refute John Good's testimony. That testimony flat out helped Zimmerman's case.
So far the prosecution has only been helping GZ with all the witnesses that support his story.
I just heard a talking head say that its in testimony that GZs PA said the next day that the wounds on his head would normally require stitches. But it had been many hours since the fight that the wounds were starting to heal.
I didn't come out with it, the Prosecutor did today when questioning the Lead Investigator.
And, like it or not policeman use tactics to get a person to give up information...The Prosecutor referred to it as "You bluffed Zimmerman"
Yet another reason for the college information. One of the courses taken by George last year I believe...was about Criminal litigation....The Prosecutor is trying to show that Zimmerman has more understanding of how this type situation, investigation could play out......It all will become clear....watch the trial.
Look at the charge against him. 2nd degree murder. None of that, nothing they've presented comes close to meeting the definition of 2nd degree murder. Not one piece of evidence nor testimony. This whole damn case should be dismissed.
If they had anything to prove it, we would've seen a hint of it by now.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
