Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Quite wrong. Women can easily cut through bs. It's part of the job of being a woman. They deal with bs every day of every week, especially coming from men who think women can't think with their brains.
Correct. Try selling any BS line to my wife?
To me he was degrading women's intelligence with every word out of his mouth. Amazes me that the women here bought his crapola. Then again they are prolly getting paid by the post from the DU.
Lets hope the stereotype doesn't hold true here. Emotion should not guide your verdict. The state doesn't care for law, so they push for emotion. They know they didn't make a case so their only hope is to demean women thinking emotion will get them a guilty verdict.
It was Trayvon's side that kept focusing on the racial differences and forced this case to go to trial when it shouldn't have in the first place. All the police that responded didn't feel Zimmerman committed a crime and knew it was self defense. At the very least there is a LOT of reasonable doubt. The media was biased at first to Trayvon. They were forced to continue covering this case because they blew it up in the first place because of PERCEIVED racial overtones. Now they must cover it and now they are being more neutral as they realize Zimmerman's story is very believable while the prosecution presented incoherent ghetto witnesses like Rachel Jeantel (you can watch her testimony over and over against and not stop ROFL!!!! Especially that head twist and sayin "oh no uh uh uh uh no no no Imma leavin today" or "I done told you I don't watch no news only the weather".
If I was on the jury I probably couldn't have helped but laugh out loud honestly at Jeantel.
The jury knows the initial coverage of the trial, and the precedent set by Rodney King.
This isn't about sides. Don't you want to see justice regardless of sides? Your attitude is why you couldn't be in the jury.
He was on the hunt...to TALK to the strange guy in the neighborhood to see if he might be one of the burglars that had plagued the neighborhood.
Coincidentally, St. Trayvon could have entered his father's girlfriend's townhouse, but instead chose to leave the house to go out and hunt the "creepy-assed cracker" with the intention of initiating a physical altercation. If Zimmerman had not shot Martin, Martin would probably be on trial for murder or attempted murder right now.
Maintain context.
If that were the case, then why did Zimmerman maintain that he was on his way back to his truck?
Why do we care? Because MSNBC, CNN and other main media sources decided this was more important than other stories and they could get good mileage out of it.
John Guy is brilliant. Line by line of the lies by the defendant and the facts that contradict them. Just the right amount of common sense and appeal to the heart without overdoing it. Absolutely brilliant.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
