Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Infringements in violation of the Constitution. Glad you asked.
We went over this 10 pages ago. In modern democratic societies we have rights and limits on those rights. If you want lawlessness & "i'll do whatever i please" there are some fine African & Mideast countries you could move to.
I can't understand why people from the better educated state of NJ are arguing about guns. Did a bunch of Southerners move into NJ with their more guns is better ideas.
Down here every loony tune in town has and probably carry's a gun and we have more domestic shootings every day than NJ has in a year. If you think arming everybody is a solution then I suggest a trip to NC to see how that's working.
Take a hard look at just who advocates liberal gun laws. It's the lower educated from the bible belt states that's who. Plus those politicians seeking their votes.
I can't believe educated people from my home state are debating about joining in with the Southern dummies.
Listen up Captain......if the term military assault style weapon is satisfactory for the President to get the message across to the nation and over 90% of the public seems to grasp the meaning of that term then it should be satisfactory for you.....unless your just dense or attempting to be difficult...... In any case take your nonsense elsewhere or request a list of "features" from the White House.
im trying to understand why its so difficult for you to name some features. you realize that when gun control laws are written; features are listed. the term "military assault style weapon" is insufficient for the president and its insufficient for legislation. the nj assault weapons ban is primarily a cosmetic issue. if someone wanted to improve upon that; they will need to do so by listing features to ban. are you so married to sensational rhetoric that you are dead set against stating something with any substance? how does substance make your argument weaker?
I can't understand why people from the better educated state of NJ are arguing about guns. Did a bunch of Southerners move into NJ with their more guns is better ideas.
Down here every loony tune in town has and probably carry's a gun and we have more domestic shootings every day than NJ has in a year. If you think arming everybody is a solution then I suggest a trip to NC to see how that's working.
Take a hard look at just who advocates liberal gun laws. It's the lower educated from the bible belt states that's who. Plus those politicians seeking their votes.
I can't believe educated people from my home state are debating about joining in with the Southern dummies.
you gotta love the "we are better so our opinions matter more" elitist leftist argument.
The Second Amendment doesn't distinguish between types of arms and makes it clear that there shall be no infringements on the right to keep and bear arms. [i]A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
I]
slight correction to what the second amendment says....
slight correction to what the second amendment says....
how does it make you feel that you had to add words to that phrase to modify its meaning? the phrase is there, so i have no issue with you including it but you added a couple of very meaningful words that arent there.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.