Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-15-2013, 04:40 AM
 
Location: MS
4,395 posts, read 4,920,600 times
Reputation: 1564

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
It's not imprisonment, it's taxing (in the case of Obamacare.)
If I refuse, what happens eventually?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
The issue with the flat tax, one who makes 40K in taxes may need more what they make than say someone who makes 500K. Now yes, 40K after 17% (the tax rate many people point to for making the flat tax rate) pays $6,800 vs. $85,000 for the person making 500K but that is still only 33.2K you get to keep after taxes. Not all areas are sustainable to live in (without including Obamacare costs) already. Now compared to the current rates, couple making 40K, you actually pay less at 15% ($6,000) versus 39.6% for a couple making 500K (198,000 is given)

The issue is people are the lower end of the spectrum are hurt more by flattenning out the tax code. Unless we eliminate taxes, somebody loses from changing the tax code.
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need". You have studied the socialist movement well, comrade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-15-2013, 06:52 AM
 
624 posts, read 941,349 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
hmm, so we (a liberal-lean middle and a financial conservative agree on something) but at the same time have different ways in achieving the same thing. As a conservative I also believe that I must "sharpen the saw". I can't remember the writer but it means take care of myself. If I am in good health financially I am able to take care of myself and my family, make sure I don't become a government dependent and after that am able to help others. If I am not in good financial help, helping others will only put me and my family in danger of becoming a government dependent. If I am being hammered before being able to take care of myself and my family then it is human nature to start to begrudge helping people who demand, expect, when they didn't earn it. They will not learn if we keep handing it all to them. I see people like this as greedy, especially when they keep doing the same failed thing over and over. I see a split here.
That doesn't mean we can't overcome it.

You don't like it that I like you. :-p
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2013, 07:10 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,610 posts, read 17,294,097 times
Reputation: 17660
The biggest player in dividing the country is the propaganda news media owned by obama, along with his kennel of lap dogs and straw dogs.

The media fires the indignation, obama alone cannot adavance his political agenda without help form his propaganda machine and criminal federal agencies crushing political opposition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2013, 07:13 AM
 
624 posts, read 941,349 times
Reputation: 977
Agreed. Not all Dems/Liberals want to grow government, though. You won't believe this, but it's true.

I believe in smart restructuring of existing programs and re-tasking of existing staff. If we could all work together, we might accomplish this and even be able to do some trimming.

Liberal activists often run their organizations on a shoestring. An admitted flaw in the thinking is that while we can function fine this way, the government has to be huge. I happen to think that's ridiculous. We have all seen that bigger is not better. Smarter is better, and with co-operation, we could take ideas from both sides and make changes that benefit everyone while not offending Conservative fiscal principles. At the local level nationwide are Liberal-minded programs with Conservative fiscal approaches, that persist by encouraging personal responsibility. With work, smart people of all stripes could incorporate these approaches at the federal level.

It would take one major concession on each side...Libs would have to stop seeing government money as an inexhaustible resource, and Cons would have to be willing to see past stereotypes about the poor. We have to be willing to teach each other, though, not lecture. And we'd have to be willing to learn from each other, not scoff. It could work if we wanted it to. Most of our problems, including this shutdown/debt ceiling mess, are about political will. Everybody wants everything and nobody's happy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2013, 07:17 AM
 
782 posts, read 1,107,488 times
Reputation: 1017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
The biggest player in dividing the country is the propaganda news media owned by obama, along with his kennel of lap dogs and straw dogs.

The media fires the indignation, obama alone cannot adavance his political agenda without help form his propaganda machine and criminal federal agencies crushing political opposition.
A right winger calling mainstream media propaganda is hillarious. Faux News quotes satirical stories as fact without retracting (spouting it multiple times to millions of viewers online then retracting to thousands of follower on twitter is not a retraction). The fact check organizations (who call out BOTH sides by the way) have far more work given to them by Faux news and right wingers - they even stopped fact checking Bachman because it was too much work, because practically everything from her is BS.

If you get your news from Faux news, Rush and the like then you should NEVER call out anyone as propaganda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2013, 07:19 AM
 
624 posts, read 941,349 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kracer View Post
The biggest player in dividing the country is the propaganda news media owned by obama, along with his kennel of lap dogs and straw dogs.

The media fires the indignation, obama alone cannot adavance his political agenda without help form his propaganda machine and criminal federal agencies crushing political opposition.
Then we should be making collective demands on our media. We are the consumers. If we reject a product, it fails no matter who is pushing it on us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2013, 07:25 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,580,006 times
Reputation: 25817
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
I'm not engaging in a popularity contest.

Perhaps there's very few people who clearly say what they're for, like I do. And even fewer in the political system who are willing to DO what they know they should.

You MIGHT be able to win office by demonizing good people and by promising to steal from a few to give to the many.

It does not make you right, moral, or good.

And if you don't care about those things, then I am truly vindicated.
And your so-called morals ~ are NOT going win a national office. Your morals are not my morals. The tea party does NOT speak for me and I absolutely do not consider them moral. Hate speech is not moral. Isolationism is not moral.

Most of America are moderates. They don't like what they see in the tea party. They do not consider them to be moral.

And talk about demonizing! Has there ever been a President more demonized than Obama?

It has turned people off and rightly so. Your constant repetition of a lie - does not make you right, moral or good either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2013, 07:32 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,603,127 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rggr View Post
You'll see it here - everybody already has their mind made up who to blame for everything and when it get tough, the blame just gets more intense - and blind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
AND there you have it ~ extremists on the right cannot or are not willing to meet in the middle. There is a small, but loud, contingent of the tea party that simply hates government. How do you compromise with THAT?
Why did you include my post above as extremist on the right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2013, 07:38 AM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,982,196 times
Reputation: 2178
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post

The issue is people are the lower end of the spectrum are hurt more by flattenning out the tax code. Unless we eliminate taxes, somebody loses from changing the tax code.
EVERYONE loses when you tax them.

That's why, if you are going to tax incomes, the ONLY moral standard is equal proportion for all, and make that enough to maintain absolutely the minimum the federal government must do, which, today, is about 1 trillion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2013, 07:45 AM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,982,196 times
Reputation: 2178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
And your so-called morals ~ are NOT going win a national office.
So it's your belief that the way to win national office is to promise to steal from some to buy the votes of others. Got it.

Quote:
Your morals are not my morals.
So, your morals are based on the notion that it is immoral to NOT steal from some to buy the votes of others.

Quote:
The tea party does NOT speak for me and I absolutely do not consider them moral.
Of course, they stand in the way of stealing more to buy more votes.

Quote:
Hate speech is not moral.
Of course you you think it is. Look at the hate speech about the TEA Party you engage in.

Quote:
Isolationism is not moral.
Isolationism is neither moral nor immoral. It is simply a short-sighted economic and trade policy.

Quote:
Most of America are moderates.
No, most Americans, like in the days of the revolution, have no idea what to believe. Thus, they have no beliefs and wander to and fro about the political landscape, flitting from this to that, with no coherent notion of what government's role should be in society.

Quote:
They don't like what they see in the tea party.
They know nothing about the TEA Party, only your hate speech.

Quote:
They do not consider them to be moral.
They make no such judgment, since they don't know anything about them, except the lies people like you tell.

Quote:
And talk about demonizing! Has there ever been a President more demonized than Obama?
In my lifetime, there hasn't been a more corrupt, incompetent, self-serving, dishonest, and hostile president.

Quote:
It has turned people off and rightly so. Your constant repetition of a lie - does not make you right, moral or good either.
I do not lie. Period. If you think what I say is untrue, then YOU are wrong, not me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top