Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-30-2013, 11:47 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,746,808 times
Reputation: 1531

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient View Post
LOL!... you're so cute when you say things like this, wish I had a camera.

No, you lunatics, foreign nations don't invade us because we have the largest, most lethal military on the face of the earth. No one in Russian, Iran, or China gives a **** about some redneck with a rifle.
So the fact that if they did get past the armed forces they would face an waiting party of around 100,000,000 Gun Owners, with about 24,000,000 Veterans does not just reinforce that idea they cant win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2013, 12:11 AM
 
Location: Louisiana
9,143 posts, read 5,808,959 times
Reputation: 7711
As much as we quarrel amongst ourselves,
they'd have to kill every last one of us
before they could take us over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 01:40 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 27 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,560,540 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
Today with 100,000,000 Gun owners, Plus 24,000,000 Veterans, yes




It prevented the Japanese Armed forces from invading the West Coast.

It also made the Mexico Government not side with Germany in World War 1 via the Zimmerman Telegraph.

Also a great shot of a Mossberg 930 Shotgun.
???

The Japanese didnt invade because it would be a suicide mission to try to invade a nation as vast as ours, it has nothing to do with the guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 02:17 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,336,651 times
Reputation: 31000
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
You forget that just inland a little ways... Are states that ARE armed. California, really, is the only totally insane one in the west. OR and WA have very liberal laws, Alaska is armed better than the military, and the next states east of the coastal states are armed like they intend to win the next world war.

Eastern seaboard? Eh, who cares? If we lost them things could only get better...
Thats an odd strategy to repel invaders , "things could only get better" if you throw half your fighting force under the bus .
In a hypothetical scenario like the op envisions no country is going to survive a dedicated action by Americas military, however a well trained army would easily defeat a scattered bunch of non trained individuals with guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 04:46 AM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,839,921 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
Today with 100,000,000 Gun owners, Plus 24,000,000 Veterans, yes




It prevented the Japanese Armed forces from invading the West Coast.

It also made the Mexico Government not side with Germany in World War 1 via the Zimmerman Telegraph.

Also a great shot of a Mossberg 930 Shotgun.
Isoroku Yamamoto - Wikiquote
You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass. It has been declared this attribution is "unsubstantiated and almost certainly bogus, even though it has been repeated thousands of times in various Internet postings. There is no record of the commander in chief of Japan’s wartime fleet ever saying it.",

Yeah, great pic. Be even cooler if it was TRUE>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 05:29 AM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,336,651 times
Reputation: 31000
As we seem to be playing around with hypothetical scenarios how about that invading force just nuke the place to slag, problem of gun owners completely eliminated..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 06:12 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,369,489 times
Reputation: 2922
If it did take place it would be U S forces and civilians and that country or group would take a major a$$ whooping. I doubt in my neck of the woods there are a lot of people who know about the Geneva convention and I won't make it a point too tell them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 06:13 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,444 posts, read 60,638,057 times
Reputation: 61060
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70Ford View Post
Isoroku Yamamoto - Wikiquote
You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass. It has been declared this attribution is "unsubstantiated and almost certainly bogus, even though it has been repeated thousands of times in various Internet postings. There is no record of the commander in chief of Japan’s wartime fleet ever saying it.",

Yeah, great pic. Be even cooler if it was TRUE>
That quote precedes the internet by about 50 years. I first saw it quoted from reports by US military personnel who debriefed Japanese high command officers at the end of WW II.

Did Yamamoto actually say it? Who knows, but it's plausibility rested on the fact that he spent several years in the US, at Yale for grad school if I remember correctly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 07:11 AM
 
25,849 posts, read 16,543,687 times
Reputation: 16028
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
Today with 100,000,000 Gun owners, Plus 24,000,000 Veterans, yes




It prevented the Japanese Armed forces from invading the West Coast.

It also made the Mexico Government not side with Germany in World War 1 via the Zimmerman Telegraph.

Also a great shot of a Mossberg 930 Shotgun.
But I wonder what side they would fight on if Obama was still their president?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 07:15 AM
 
25,849 posts, read 16,543,687 times
Reputation: 16028
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
I'm not sure about making an invasion much harder, but it certainly would make holding the country much more difficult.
What if the invading army decided to use chemical weapons in areas of high gun ownership before they even occupy the area?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top