Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,745,694 times
Reputation: 1531

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weichert View Post
Low regulations? Yep, polluted drinking water also. Plants blowing up.

Stable weather and lack of natural disasters? Ummm ... ah, Katrina?
I was talking about Nevada

and please drop the gasland lies....

 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,820,009 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
So there was not any advantages?
Atlanta? Umm, I don't know how old it is but it was burned down 150 years ago. New Orleans - at least 200 years old. Charleston - who knows? 250 years old? Memphis? How much lead time do you want?

These places have been around quite a while. But the west coast cities have long since passed them.

You are making excuses, grasping at imaginary straws.
 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:33 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,745,694 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlfieBoy View Post
Texas: 7.2% unemployment, 25th highest income and $49,392 median household income
Mass: 6.5%, 5th highest income, $62,859 median household income
And North Dakota?
 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,745,694 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
In most cases we are only talking about 20-30 years, but even 100 years won't give you an advantage. Univ of Chicago is younger than Dartmouth, but is still ranked higher.

University of Mississippi: 1848
University of California: 1868
University of Texas: 1883
University of Illinois: 1867
I did not mean the Universities I mean the states, Sure being at the start of the industrial revolution was a advantage..
 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:35 PM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,022,870 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurbie View Post

Cities tend to be liberal. When the red state urban areas get large enough, the states will turn blue. It's already happened in California, Colorado, and Virginia. Georgia, Arizona, and Texas are next.

There is nothing you can do to stop that.
You make it sound like it is an incurable disease
 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:36 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,267,905 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
What's the point, if after graduation they move to a Red State
They normally don't.
 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas,Nevada
9,282 posts, read 6,745,694 times
Reputation: 1531
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin View Post
What's the point, if after graduation they move to a Red State
That is were the jobs are and will be...
 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:37 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,267,905 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunlover View Post
I did not mean the Universities I mean the states, Sure being at the start of the industrial revolution was a advantage..
I saw that after I typed my response.
 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:37 PM
 
794 posts, read 819,573 times
Reputation: 1142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weichert View Post
Please make the case that there is lot of voting fraud.

I read that the GOP tried to make this an issue, did their own study. And surprise surprise found very little. They then slowly, quietly began to drop it as an issue. Guess you missed the order to drop it.
Please make the case that "assault rifles" need to be banned in light of the statistical insignificance of rifle deaths in relation to the overall population of the US.

I read that the Democrat party tried to make this an issue..

Quote:
The number of murders in the U.S. in 2011 committed with rifles: 323.
‘Assault’ rifles are not involved in many U.S. murders: A look at the data - Capitol Report - MarketWatch
 
Old 04-25-2014, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,820,009 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Maryland View Post
Please make the case that "assault rifles" need to be banned in light of the statistical insignificance of rifle deaths in relation to the overall population of the US.

I read that the Democrat party tried to make this an issue..


‘Assault’ rifles are not involved in many U.S. murders: A look at the data - Capitol Report - MarketWatch
Rifles? What do rifles have to do with voting?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top