Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-03-2014, 06:09 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
I don't see how anyone could ever be worse than George W Bush.
That is because you do not know anything about US Presidents.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-03-2014, 06:20 AM
 
Location: Richmond,VA
3,841 posts, read 3,068,256 times
Reputation: 2830
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
I don't see how anyone could ever be worse than George W Bush.
I don't see how you're going to get Obama's boot polish off your tongue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 06:30 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,087,442 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Lincoln and Wilson were also elected twice, and FDR was elected FOUR times. So the electorate in those days were much worse than the electorate today.
Back then there was not the instant communications and the ability to hear the news instantly. It was a forced ignorance on the part of the electorate. There are no excuses today for a significant portion of the electorate to be ignorant. They are ignorant out of choice. That makes them the worst of all time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruzincat View Post
Back then there was not the instant communications and the ability to hear the news instantly. It was a forced ignorance on the part of the electorate. There are no excuses today for a significant portion of the electorate to be ignorant. They are ignorant out of choice. That makes them the worst of all time.
I will grant you that in Lincoln's day there was no instant communications outside the telegraph, but there certainly was instant communication in Wilson's and FDR's day. It was called "radio."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 06:48 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
I don't see how anyone could ever be worse than George W Bush.

What did Bush do, that Obama has not doubled down on?

Killing innocent people?
Getting involved in someone elses fight?

Did Bush use the Federal Government, to go after and punish his political adversaries?

The economy tanked when Pelosi & Reid took the reigns, cannot blame that all on Bush, as he was warning for years, that the fuse was lit on an explosion. Congress writes the law. The President enforces that law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 06:50 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
What did Bush do, that Obama has not doubled down on?

Killing innocent people?
Getting involved in someone elses fight?

Did Bush use the Federal Government, to go after and punish his political adversaries?

The economy tanked when Pelosi & Reid took the reigns, cannot blame that all on Bush, as he was warning for years, that the fuse was lit on an explosion. Congress writes the law. The President enforces that law.
Anyone who blames, or gives credit to, any President for the state of the economy is only demonstrating that they are civically illiterate and have no clue about how their own government functions.

That is the very definition of a "low-information voter."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,216,524 times
Reputation: 8537
Pres. Obama will go down as a good Pres. Might even be great will not know till after he is out of office and his policies play out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,640,534 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
What did Bush do, that Obama has not doubled down on?
When Bush walked in the office, the country was in good shape, and when he finally walked out, the it was a heap of rubble. That is a fact. You can blame Obama all you want for not fixing everything fast enough, I do not care (I did not vote for him), but that does not make him a worse president than the one who caused the damage in the first place
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Hiding from Antifa!
7,783 posts, read 6,087,442 times
Reputation: 7099
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
I will grant you that in Lincoln's day there was no instant communications outside the telegraph, but there certainly was instant communication in Wilson's and FDR's day. It was called "radio."
Today we can get on the internet and discuss topics on places like CD. There are hundreds of places people can go to hear opposing views and give their own, as well as hearing the responses to their own. Of course there are still people who won't listen to anything that they disagree with.

Back then you might discuss politics at the barbershop or somewhere else, mainly person to person. If you say something stupid, you might withdraw and never speak again. Now we can do the same thing and nobody knows who we are. It's a lot different than it was when there was just radio and TV.

There is no excuse for the ignorance of the electorate today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 07:01 AM
 
174 posts, read 181,682 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_250 View Post
He's a president? I thought he was the United States golf ambassador.
In all seriousness he has done things that are good for the Country.
Name one thing good he has done for the country?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top