NYT Bombshell Story: Bush Was Right Saddam Hussein Did Possess Weapons Of Mass Destruction (gallon, wage)

[california-jewel]

Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ

Obama has been visible checked out on has a Let's See More, approach. In the world of world affairs, any president must be decisive on the information available. Many will forget, or choose to forget the wave of Terrorism was coming from Clinton and exploded on US Shores. The WTT, NY City, 911!

We had the USS Cole, Cobalt towers , the First Bombing of the WTT.

Like or not and history support President Bush , he made the right decision. Now the road of Freedom and the preservation of peace is not easy. President actually fire Rumsfeld and change direction in Iraq that by the end of the Bush second term there was relative peace.

Bush took on a recession and we as a country enjoyed prosperity, until the housing crisis. Which could be argued that was caused by Senior Democrats. We all know the players. Bush actually worked with Dems and passed Democratic sponsor bills. Ted Kennedy Remember?

Its taken 6 year for Obama to turn the economy what it took Bush by the 3 year of his 1st term.

Bush Decisive, very much. Obama weak on leadership and very bad policy.

Amen and God Bless You.

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ

Like or not and history support President Bush , he made the right decision.

You think future historians will look at the Iraq war as the right decision? That's an interesting point of view.

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

What article

Umm, the title of the thread should tell you what article


"NYT Bombshell Story"

, and don't tell me what he says, give me the time frame.....because what you quoted he stated is only part of the entire sentence...(see I did watch the video)

I gave you both what he said AND a time frame.

you are stalling.

[Rggr]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

Facts, I have a video of the man speaking.

this is from 2006. So either he was lying or WMD = Nukes


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_A77N5WKWM

When you start getting into splitting definitions of words, you may be losing the argument - ("It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is.")

[djacques]

Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ

Bush Decisive, very much.

So was Saddam Hussein.

Decisiveness is not a virtue when you rip it out of any meaningful context.

[GHOSTRIDER AZ]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

Please give me the years you speak of?

[LEFT]Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis/wp-srv/onpolitics/transcripts/senateroll...
Oct 11, 2002 · Senate Roll Call: Iraq ... senator voted on President Bush's Iraq resolution. A "yes" vote was a vote to grant ... yes" were 29 Democrats and 48Republicans.[/LEFT]

[GHOSTRIDER AZ]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

You think future historians will look at the Iraq war as the right decision? That's an interesting point of view.

Considering , all the issues are the table at the time. Saddams Hassam Violations and his Regime violating the UN Peace agreement from Gulf War one and the human Rights issue against the Kurds?
Yes. Is war Hell ? Clearly Yes!

[GHOSTRIDER AZ]

Originally Posted by djacques

So was Saddam Hussein.

Decisiveness is not a virtue when you rip it out of any meaningful context.

OK, So leading from behind is OK?

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by Rggr

When you start getting into splitting definitions of words, you may be losing the argument - ("It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is.")

The President himself said We did not fine WMD's

So that means HE(not me, but the president himself) defined them as nukes.

SO how does it mean im losing an argument by defining the word by the Presidents own definition ?

[boxus]

Originally Posted by gretsky99

Will the left now apologize to Bush...I doubt it...I'm curious how long did the NYT sit on this story..

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...pons.html?_r=0

You obviously did not comprehend the article;

"The United States had gone to war declaring it must destroy an active weapons of mass destruction program. Instead, American troops gradually found and ultimately suffered from the remnants of long-abandoned programs, built in close collaboration with the West."

"In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures."

This is a far, far cry from the "active" WMD program Bush claimed Iraq had.

Even former Sec of Defense Gates' stated in his book Duty, that there were no WMDs in Iraq.