Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:27 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,473,071 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by quick enough View Post
now tell us the rest of the story.

??? ???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-20-2015, 02:26 AM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,022 posts, read 2,275,854 times
Reputation: 2168
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
I couldn't agree more. This topic has been beat to death on this forum; but, these leftists continue to start thread after thread with the same meme, that the government "subsidizes" businesses that pay minimum wage for some positions.

There will always be minimum wage jobs available, and there will always be people who have not yet gained the skills for higher paying jobs.

You don't do anyone any favors by making it easy for them to remain in low skilled jobs. Raising the minimum wage, only decreases the number of jobs available for these low skilled workers, and endless welfare payments (which are transfer payments) does not encourage one to learn better skills. Making one comfortable in their "poverty" is not the way to improve lives.
What do you think will happen when a bunch of people for these jobs. The simple facts are there are not enough higher paying jobs for every poor person someone has to do these lower wage jobs for the companies to survive. If you do not understand this it is because you do not understand our economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 02:28 AM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,022 posts, read 2,275,854 times
Reputation: 2168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
It's funny my nephew works at a fast food place and HAS BEEN ALL THROUGH HIS SENIOR YEAR IN HIGH SCHOOL. Upon graduation at 18, he was made an Asst. Mgr. The owner sees the potential and he wants to groom him to be able to own his own store.

How long have you been working there?

I think we see the problem.
Let me ask you how many managers does that comapany? Let me guess less then employees the store has not all store employees can become managers fast food restaurants only need a couple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 02:36 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,233,828 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by good_topics View Post
In the year 2015 maybe about 25% of all jobs pay at a rate that allows full time workers to get government benefits. Even if the current people who are working in these jobs get training and move out of the low wage workplace someone else will take their place. So the argument that low wage workers just need to get more skills and education to move up does not really help the situation. Face it, no matter who is working in these jobs at any time, a large number of jobs in America pay under $10 an hour. And these are the jobs that are growing in today's economy. If you want a job, these are the jobs the typical American can get. And they are not jobs for kids and senior citizens anymore. Lots of the folks working at McDonalds are bring up a family on that job's income.

So, who should pay for the government benefits for the 25% of households whose primary bread winner is making $8 an hour or less than $20K a year?

Is it the responsibility of the employers of low wage labor? Or every taxpayer? Or should we just eliminate things like Food Stamps, reduced lunches at school, Medicaid, government paid housing, etc. for people who work?

Remember, someone is going to be doing these low wage jobs regardless of the hopes and dreams of people in them today.
What drivel.

What King of job killing, demented nonsense is this?

Why does anyone think a burger flipper is a profession?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 03:15 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,465,596 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by good_topics View Post
In the year 2015 maybe about 25% of all jobs pay at a rate that allows full time workers to get government benefits. Even if the current people who are working in these jobs get training and move out of the low wage workplace someone else will take their place. So the argument that low wage workers just need to get more skills and education to move up does not really help the situation. Face it, no matter who is working in these jobs at any time, a large number of jobs in America pay under $10 an hour. And these are the jobs that are growing in today's economy. If you want a job, these are the jobs the typical American can get. And they are not jobs for kids and senior citizens anymore. Lots of the folks working at McDonalds are bring up a family on that job's income.

So, who should pay for the government benefits for the 25% of households whose primary bread winner is making $8 an hour or less than $20K a year?

Is it the responsibility of the employers of low wage labor? Or every taxpayer? Or should we just eliminate things like Food Stamps, reduced lunches at school, Medicaid, government paid housing, etc. for people who work?

Remember, someone is going to be doing these low wage jobs regardless of the hopes and dreams of people in them today.
So what you're saying is that you created a welfare state that failed and you can no longer sustain it, so now you want to shift the cost of it over to private business and demonize them to keep yourself looking like a saint. I think that about sums it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 03:57 AM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,554,254 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
So what you're saying is that you created a welfare state that failed and you can no longer sustain it, so now you want to shift the cost of it over to private business and demonize them to keep yourself looking like a saint. I think that about sums it up.
Yup.

Businesses are not responsible for their employees using welfare. Not all jobs are intended to pay a livable wage. Many can't and allow the business to remain in business. I can't imagine forcing fast food chains to pay $30K/year or whatever a livable wage is deemed. What would an order of fries have to cost to sustain that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 04:10 AM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,060,276 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by good_topics View Post
In the year 2015 maybe about 25% of all jobs pay at a rate that allows full time workers to get government benefits. Even if the current people who are working in these jobs get training and move out of the low wage workplace someone else will take their place. So the argument that low wage workers just need to get more skills and education to move up does not really help the situation. Face it, no matter who is working in these jobs at any time, a large number of jobs in America pay under $10 an hour. And these are the jobs that are growing in today's economy. If you want a job, these are the jobs the typical American can get. And they are not jobs for kids and senior citizens anymore. Lots of the folks working at McDonalds are bring up a family on that job's income.

So, who should pay for the government benefits for the 25% of households whose primary bread winner is making $8 an hour or less than $20K a year?

Is it the responsibility of the employers of low wage labor? Or every taxpayer? Or should we just eliminate things like Food Stamps, reduced lunches at school, Medicaid, government paid housing, etc. for people who work?

Remember, someone is going to be doing these low wage jobs regardless of the hopes and dreams of people in them today.
No. It's your responsibility to live within your means.

Bad things happen to good people and there should be safety nets, but the belief that you can raise a family with minimal skills and minimum wage is your problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 05:27 AM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Wow. discuss cutting food stamps, and everyone on the right here cheers. Discuss companies not being subsidized by the state....and everyone here starts talking about the poor poor companies, and how dare we talk about making them pay the actual costs of their employees. The NERVE of us.

Wow....I just ....wow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 08:06 AM
 
4,873 posts, read 3,603,930 times
Reputation: 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-310 View Post
What drivel.

What King of job killing, demented nonsense is this?

Why does anyone think a burger flipper is a profession?
Why does anyone think that a significant portion of the jobs that require doing in our economy (like flipping burgers) should pay crappy wages? Why does anyone think it's okay to say, "we need people to do these jobs, and we need them to not make any money doing it"?

It's like one of those demented comic-book supervillains who makes the hero choose which person will die, and then raves about how "I didn't kill anyone, you are the one who made me do it". Except instead of a stupid comic book plot, it's taken as a serious macroeconomic argument for some reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
With the growing number of poor you're going to have to find some other way to generate revenue for the government to pay for all these social programs.

Taxing the employer won't work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top