Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-19-2015, 04:59 PM
 
Location: University City, Philadelphia
22,632 posts, read 14,948,315 times
Reputation: 15935

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Too low? Who made that decision? Why not $150? Because that would be crazy?
It's not a decision. I was stating an opinion. In my opinion $7.25 is too low.

If the $7.25 is not too low, why not reduce it to $5 an hour or $3 an hour? The minimum wage law was lower in the past and it gets raised from time to time with inflation. No?

When people work for the minimum wage they have to survive and often do so by applying for food stamps, welfare, Section 8 housing, and other programs. Personally I would like to see them making a little more money and not having them eligible for those tax-payer funded programs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2015, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,193,867 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Again, if they could find better job, why would they work for the said business to begin with??? There are low skilled workers you are talking about.

Please also keep in mind, it wouldn't be just this one business going out. They had a job, and you just took the jobs away.
You would have to ask these fictional employees working for this fictional failing gym, though one would think they could just try to get a job at a more successful gym.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,193,867 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioRules View Post
Who made that rule?

What a bunch of gibberish.
That is just common sense, not gibberish, if you can't afford to pay your employees the minimum amount, then you probably shouldn't be having any employees working for them. It is a capitalism rule.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,193,867 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haakon View Post
When YOU arbitrarily dictate the wage at an unjustified level how is it the business fault if they can't pay it?



Again, when YOU arbitrarily dictate the wage at an unjustified level how is it the business fault if they can't pay it?

If a job brings in $10 / hour in value the employee can be paid minimum wage @ $7.50 / hour, if you force the business to now pay $15 how is it the business fault they can't pay the new artificial wage?
All wages are arbitrarily dictated, and yes, if a business cannot afford to pay their employees the minimum amount, then it is the fault of the business.

If having an employee only gets you 25% profit off a minimum wage job, does it make sense to have that employee or just do it yourself? Also, not all jobs are directly tied to profits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 06:46 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,572,795 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
That is just common sense, not gibberish, if you can't afford to pay your employees the minimum amount, then you probably shouldn't be having any employees working for them. It is a capitalism rule.
You mean the dictatorship rule?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 06:48 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,572,795 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
You would have to ask these fictional employees working for this fictional failing gym, though one would think they could just try to get a job at a more successful gym.
You would think those employees would have tried that already if they could have found anything better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 06:49 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,193,867 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
You mean the dictatorship rule?
No, it sounds like you don't know how capitalism functions. If you cannot afford to pay your employees, then you shouldn't have employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,193,867 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
You would think those employees would have tried that already if they could have found anything better.
Maybe these fictional employees liked worked for this failing gym. You act like people are incapable of finding other jobs if one job they have fails.

Oh look, this new fictional gym opened up down the street and signed up 1000 new members in the town and has a "now hiring" sign outside. It looks like these fictional people will be okay because they just got hired onto a more successful gym.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 07:07 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,572,795 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Maybe these fictional employees liked worked for this failing gym. You act like people are incapable of finding other jobs if one job they have fails.

Oh look, this new fictional gym opened up down the street and signed up 1000 new members in the town and has a "now hiring" sign outside. It looks like these fictional people will be okay because they just got hired onto a more successful gym.
I am not saying they are incapable to find different jobs but I think it's utterly stupid to force them out of job, don't you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2015, 07:11 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,193,867 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
I am not saying they are incapable to find different jobs but I think it's utterly stupid to force them out of job, don't you think?
It isn't there choice if their employer runs a failed business. That fictional gym had 227 members, that clearly wasn't enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top