Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA
If only I'd thought to put "European" in my post. Wait, I did.
|
I see you decided to make side remarks loosing all sense of decorum. Ya punked out, Son. You need to be pretty witty to carry on like that.
and uh, you mean like since the break up of Yugoslavia? Europeans were sending arms to my long lost relatives. And its also the case that Keiv took the fighting to the East.
Source:
How West Let Croatia Sneak Arms - tribunedigital-chicagotribune
An Italian magistrate said the smuggling was so rampant that directors at Rome's Cinecitta movie studios who thought they were importing old Soviet tanks for their film sets saw the weapons head instead to Croatia.
"I am convinced there are forces that do not want us to make any headway or investigate this smuggling," said Romano Dolce, assistant attorney general of the city of Como in northern Italy.
See where Putin gets his ideas?
Quote:
Nice. Clearly Putin doesn't.
|
Well established borders don't turn into war zones immediately when they are drawn. That was the case in Gerogia. Ukraine was all but a hot war since 1990s. Their politics was based on it form the beginning. It never worked which was why the Maiden protest happened. The country never worked. It never will until its broken up into small enough and homogeneous regions to support republican government.
Quote:
Or some respect for minorities. Because it's a given that there will be mixing. So perhaps we should drop the "blut-und-boden" thinking and accept the 21st century fact there will be people of different cultures living among us?
|
I will count you among the many who cannot tell the difference between a melting pot and Balkanization. When a few families move in they essentially blend in. When a hundred thousand move into an area with irreconcilable differences with their neighbours, its Balkanized.
However I see that it is consistent with your rigid, rule based line of thinking. You figure we have many cultures and people live among many different cultures and therefore its always good. I sort of think a pork barbecue next to a mosque might have compatibly problems if both cultures are not assimilated into the US ideal of governance.
The Hmong in St Paul or Sudanese in Omaha clearly come at a cost. The only chance of success is to limit the number, and more importantly, part of a much bigger state swamping any local rivalry. In larger numbers and without a central state it would be chaos beyond all recognition. That little segregation problem in the South would have been a bloody hot war if it were not part of the US. That's Asia without Moscow.
Quote:
Anyway, if you're hunky-dory with the annexation of Czechoslovakia, I suspect we won't see eye-to-eye on much.
|
I see you have entered the factually vacant and pointless bickering phase typical of weak arguments. I say for a third time my problem was with my own state's use of propaganda tactics. However the map justifies the means as you say.
I am hunky-dory with the break up of Czechoslovakia though. Why was that ignored in Ukraine when the East asked for it 1993?
Speaking of that "well established borders", after WWI they were arranged at Versailles, more or less stabbing Germany in the back . That it resulted in some 60 million deaths. Good cartography though.
I think there needs to be a moratorium on newly created states, not maintaining the the state at all costs.
You don't which I guess you suppose to be some greater good.
To each his own but do try to maintain some civility.