Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
These people are not killing themselves. They already have their death sentence. They are just choosing to go on their own terms without needlessly suffering. My grandmother suffered a long cruel agonizing death when she was in hospice as her lungs and other organs were overcome by metastasized Ovarian Cancer. I find staking out a position that would deprive people of the option to avoid unnecessary suffering by speeding up the process of death (which to me is much different to suicide) to be quite ill considered not to mention cruel.
My sympathy on the loss of your grandmother. Ovarian cancer is a particularly awful way to die.
Wow, war on drugs. You have a problem with that? I didn't think anyone would have had a problem with substance abuse laws.
Marriage has always been a right of anyone. The definition of marriage had been between a man and a woman. No one was keeping anyone from getting married. I knew of gay men that had married women. Noting stopping anyone before the courts took it upon themselves to interpret the law. The Constitution does not speak about marriage. it was a ruling that should have never happened.
Abortion is another ruling the the constitution does not talk about. Should have never happened. The court should have been silent on the matter. Planned Parenthood on the other hand was created by a woman who wanted to do one thing, kill off all people of color in this country.
No one has ever kept a woman from deciding to have or not have children. If women don't want to have kids then they should not be having sex, simple as that.
Wow, war on drugs. You have a problem with that? I didn't think anyone would have had a problem with substance abuse laws.
Marriage has always been a right of anyone. The definition of marriage had been between a man and a woman. No one was keeping anyone from getting married. I knew of gay men that had married women. Noting stopping anyone before the courts took it upon themselves to interpret the law. The Constitution does not speak about marriage. it was a ruling that should have never happened.
Abortion is another ruling the the constitution does not talk about. Should have never happened. The court should have been silent on the matter. Planned Parenthood on the other hand was created by a woman who wanted to do one thing, kill off all people of color in this country.
No one has ever kept a woman from deciding to have or not have children. If women don't want to have kids then they should not be having sex, simple as that.
Let me know when you find a time machine. The rest of us have joined the 21st century.
Not sure why anyone would be against allowing a terminally ill person to choose when they want to die with dignity. This is a personal choice and should be legal in every state in the US.
Not sure why anyone would be against allowing a terminally ill person to choose when they want to die with dignity. This is a personal choice and should be legal in every state in the US.
Talk about the ultimate exercise of personal freedom.
Talk about the ultimate exercise of personal freedom.
Exactly, as a conservative, I can't see why anyone would be against this. This is probably one of the few things I agree with left wingers with.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.