Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't know what you were watching. I thought he was hard-hitting and had the right answers to the questions. The audience seemed to agree, they applauded. My sons watching with me said "he's awesome!"
"When Bernie is asked, ‘Are you a socialist?’ he doesn't deny it, and he immediately talks about Scandinavia. He uses them interchangeably. But if you look at his history, he knows the distinction," Schwartz said.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 25 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,561 posts, read 16,552,753 times
Reputation: 6043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones
What??? That's not how it works. You actually have to have ID to register that says you are a citizen, like a BC. In order to get the DL which you get registered while doing so you have to have a BC and other forms of ID. In order to get a SS card and get registered at the same time you have to have a BC and other forms of ID. If you have that you get registered, if you don't you don't. They don't take the registrations from just anyone and decide later. Who told you that nonsense?
I have registers thousands of voters over the last 4 years in 3 states.
1. a Drivers license only proves that you can operate a vehicle, not that you are a citizen or eligible to vote.
2. it is the board of Registrars that goes through your information and decides if you are eligible to vote.They are the ones who verify the information on your application and your legal status as a citizen. Simply applying to vote(registering) does not give you the ability to vote.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 25 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,561 posts, read 16,552,753 times
Reputation: 6043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_250
I watched the debate for a little over an hour and a half last night. Some take-a-ways I observed.
O'Malley will not win. He is way too staged and almost seems to talk down on people. He had a person for every situation and they seemed to be "in the audience." lol
The debate audience was invite only. He simply knew the list of people invited(and their stories), what is wrong with that ?
Remember, California just passed and Dem. Brown signed the law/authorization that illegals must be issued a driver's license and just 2 days ago added that when these illegals are issued that license they are also "automatically" registered to vote. How in the he!! can that be allowed...it CANNOT since it is against the United States of America's Constitution. But that certainly shows to what illegal and criminal lengths Dems will go to win at all costs.
Not so fast... Assembly Bill 1461 would allow relevant customer information including a copy of a digitized signature, to be sent from DMV computers to the California Secretary of State, who would certify the individual’s eligibility and pass it along to the appropriate county registrar of voters.
What??? That's not how it works. You actually have to have ID to register that says you are a citizen, like a BC. In order to get the DL which you get registered while doing so you have to have a BC and other forms of ID. In order to get a SS card and get registered at the same time you have to have a BC and other forms of ID. If you have that you get registered, if you don't you don't. They don't take the registrations from just anyone and decide later. Who told you that nonsense?
Not only is that not required, the Supreme Court refused to hear a case filed by States that were trying to impose that requirement thus affirming that the states could not require it for federal elections
Quote:
"The Supreme Court has declined to hear a case allowing states to require proof of citizenship for those applying to vote in federal elections, effectively upholding a lower court ruling against Kansas and Arizona.
Those states wanted the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to change its registration requirements to include proof of citizenship for those applying to vote in federal elections, as the states require for those using their state forms.
By not taking the case, the Supreme Court leaves in place a November 2014 ruling from the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the states cannot require the documentation for applicants using the so-called “federal form.”"]The Supreme Court has declined to hear a case allowing states to require proof of citizenship for those applying to vote in federal elections, effectively upholding a lower court ruling against Kansas and Arizona.
Those states wanted the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to change its registration requirements to include proof of citizenship for those applying to vote in federal elections, as the states require for those using their state forms.
By not taking the case, the Supreme Court leaves in place a November 2014 ruling from the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the states cannot require the documentation for applicants using the so-called “federal form.”Supreme Court denies states
Hmmm, the ONLY issue I heard was "how many freebees are we going to give away and how much.! Didn''t hear one word of policy outside of "raise the minimum wage" which will destroy jobs and Sanders shouting how he wants to destroy those who actually create businesses that, in turn, create the jobs. Neither of those policies show "smart people" spitting out those "policies."
Then, my friend, you were not listening but I see you have the 'freebie' talking points down.
It's a little more realistic that Trumps GIANT, BEAUTIFUL, WALL (with a door).
What does any of your opinion have to do with someone changing their argument after being proven wrong ????
Describes why all that flip-flopping or changing of mind or reversing of position simply proves that the person that does that either does not pay attention to the subject matter before snapping out a position, is frivilous and doesn't think anyone will do anything but take their word right or wrong doesn't matter or doesn't truly understand the issue...in any case, not the mental mind-frame required of some one holding the position of President of the United States.
If that happened, you would be correct, but it didnt.
Registering to vote is as simply as filling out a piece of paper, it doesnt mean the board of registrars will actually approve you. Vladimir Putin can "register" to vote in the U.S.
Wrong! They ARE registered to vote WITHOUT any proof of citizenship required for either license or registration. If one is "registered" to vote, they can vote. There is NO approval requirement for anyone. When I registered to vote, I had to produce my birth certificate. That was the only requirement. There is no requirement to prove citizenship in this case.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
